Morgan Freeman: Tea Party is racist

#351
#351
Muschump said:
Vote Cain? :eek:lol:

You don't actually think Republicans are going to nominate a black man are you? Get real. Romney is winning the nomination and the TP is voting with Republicans.

Evidence that Tea Party members didn't care about the "economy" before Obama? Seriously? Where were the conservative rallies when Bush was waging a multi-trillion dollar war in Iraq?
Click to expand...

Wow u r one racist bigot
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#352
#352
Muschump said:
Vote Cain? :eek:lol:

You don't actually think Republicans are going to nominate a black man are you? Get real. Romney is winning the nomination and the TP is voting with Republicans.

Evidence that Tea Party members didn't care about the "economy" before Obama? Seriously? Where were the conservative rallies when Bush was waging a multi-trillion dollar war in Iraq?
Click to expand...

TP aren't the R-party. More TP members support Cain than Romney by a large margin - you conveniently ignore that. Imagine that, them supporting a brown man; what is the world coming to.

Where are the anti-war protesters under Obama?
 
#353
#353
volinbham said:
TP aren't the R-party. More TP members support Cain than Romney by a large margin - you conveniently ignore that. Imagine that, them supporting a brown man; what is the world coming to.

Where are the anti-war protesters under Obama?
Click to expand...

Hello, have to tote the party line over principle
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#355
#355
It's not surprising you always dodge that question. The correct answer would be "they didn't care about the economy." But being truthful with that answer would sort of fly in the face of everything you've been posting.
 
#356
#356
Heck, do a search on this board, outrage over bush every where still contend bush makes fdr look like walter mondale
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#357
#357
Muschump said:
The Tea Party will support whoever the R-party nominates. I'm sure you understand this.

They likely will - it doesn't mean that person is their first choice. I guarantee a major portion of the TP would get behind Cain before they would get behind Romney. You continue to ignore that.

"Complete dodge - no surprise"
Click to expand...

No dodge - it's the analogous counter to your evidence. You wonder why there weren't mass rallies against Bush spending - simple, he was ramping up and people just started to notice.

Where did all those war protesters go? Why don't they accuse Obama of war crimes? Why aren't they marching in the streets? Where's the group of people camping out in front of his Chicago home?
 
#358
#358
Muschump said:
It's not surprising you always dodge that question. The correct answer would be "they didn't care about the economy." But being truthful with that answer would sort of fly in the face of everything you've been posting.
Click to expand...
That's farging stupid as hell. Your evidence for this idiocy is lack of protests? How retarded is that. One would think you'd understand after about 5 times beig asked about lack of protests for the wars when Obama took over.

I can see from your posts that you can't think your way out of a paper sack, but it still surprises me.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#359
#359
Muschump said:
It's not surprising you always dodge that question. The correct answer would be "they didn't care about the economy." But being truthful with that answer would sort of fly in the face of everything you've been posting.
Click to expand...

they most certainly cared about the economy - it just happened to be pretty good until the very end.
 
#360
#360
volinbham said:
No dodge - it's the analogous counter to your evidence. You wonder why there weren't mass rallies against Bush spending - simple, he was ramping up and people just started to notice.
Click to expand...

Just starting to notice? When did the Iraq War start? How long does it take to notice? I think you just proved my point about these dolts not giving two shts about politics until Obama Was elected. Thanks.
volinbham said:
they most certainly cared about the economy - it just happened to be pretty good until the very end.
Click to expand...

So wasteful government spending (trillions of dollars) doesn't reaaally bother them if the economy is "pretty good." Interesting. Starting to make sense of all of this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#361
#361
Muschump said:
Just starting to notice? When did the Iraq War start? How long does it take to notice? I think you just proved my point about these dolts not giving two shts about politics until Obama Was elected. Thanks.

What explains the war protester dolts?


So wasteful government spending (trillions of dollars) doesn't reaaally bother them if the economy is "pretty good." Interesting. Starting to make sense of all of this.
Click to expand...

Yes that equals racism clear as day.

Likewise, no longer caring about wars must equal racism. Afterall, when ever rally/protesting behavior changes along with 1600 P. Ave resident's skin color the only conclusion can be racism. So obvious.

Could it be that wasteful spending is distasteful but almost tolerable if the overall economy can handle it but when it gets ramped up massively at the same time the economy tanks thus exaggerating the debt effect and slapping the face of the electorate who has no choice to cut back all the while government goes on a spending frenzy? Nah - racism makes more sense.
 
#362
#362
BigPapaVol said:
One would think you'd understand after about 5 times beig asked about lack of protests for the wars when Obama took over.
Click to expand...

Because it doesn't make sense. I don't remember protests for the wars. Just the war. The Iraq war. Why in the hell would people still be protesting it?
 
#363
#363
And liberals are speaking out against the Afghanistan War. Now more than ever.

Doesn't really support your point though, does it?
 
#364
#364
Muschump said:
Because it doesn't make sense. I don't remember protests for the wars. Just the war. The Iraq war. Why in the hell would people still be protesting it?
Click to expand...

They only stopped for white guilt. Absence of protest usually means pure ambivalence, no?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#365
#365
Muschump said:
Because it doesn't make sense. I don't remember protests for the wars. Just the war. The Iraq war. Why in the hell would people still be protesting it?
Click to expand...

You don't remember war protests? Seriously? Didn't any of your racist friends complain about them? You don't remember Cindy Sheehan and her band of merry protesters?

So it's only appropriate to protest a war at the beginning then you might as well sit back and take it?
 
#366
#366
Muschump said:
And liberals are speaking out against the Afghanistan War. Now more than ever.

Doesn't really support your point though, does it?
Click to expand...

Where are the protests and why 3 years into a godawful presidency? Why the pause?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#368
#368
volinbham said:
You don't remember war protests? Seriously? Didn't any of your racist friends complain about them? You don't remember Cindy Sheehan and her band of merry protesters?

So it's only appropriate to protest a war at the beginning then you might as well sit back and take it?
Click to expand...

Cindy Sheehan was against the Iraq war. She has also spoken out against Obama, anyways. What's your point?
 
#369
#369
Muschump said:
Cindy Sheehan was against the Iraq war. She has also spoken out against Obama, anyways. What's your point?
Click to expand...
She hasn't always spoken out against Obama and she damn sure hasn't protested. Her garbage against Bush was reprehensible. Lack of action on her "principles" now says 100% white guilt.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#370
#370
Muschump said:
fyp
Click to expand...

let's run with this - in fact I made this point earlier. The TP is definitely more friendly to military spending than other government spending; particularly in areas that are not directly enumerated roles of the Federal government in the Constitution.

Other than Medicare Part D, Bush's spending sins were military and tax cuts - again, an area that the TP inherently supports since it limits the intrusion of the Federal government.

Now let's look at Obama, - massive direct transfer payments to states and unions, union bail-outs, Obamacare, etc. etc.

All perfectly good explanatory reasons why policy differences motivate increased concern among TPs.

Yet you discount it all and fall back on racism.
 
#372
#372
Muschump said:
Cindy Sheehan was against the Iraq war. She has also spoken out against Obama, anyways. What's your point?
Click to expand...

Iraq was still going on under Obama no? Why didn't she camp out at this home?

What about all the other Iraq protesters? The troves of Guantanamo haters? The "rendition is anti-American" crowd? They've all magically calmed down once Obama came on board. If rendition and Guantanamo are war crimes and Constitutional violations why aren't they under Obama? Where's the outcry? Why is it a mere fraction of what it was under Bush?
 
#373
#373
Can I get a simple answer from you guys?

In your opinion, will the Tea Party back Romney if he wins the Republican nomination?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top