Mormon Proxy Baptisms

Why does Paul disagree with James?


Gal 1:6 to 9
Gal 2:1 to 14
Gal 3:1


The dead sea scrolls contain the spouter of lies which many believe is Paul. The orthodox church backs Pauls rejection of the nazarine way or Jesus way.

James, Peter and John taught women may teach nazarine doctrine.

Paul says...

1 Cor 14: 33 to 36
1 tim 2: 11 to 15

Part 2
 
Many of the ways of nazarine taught by Jesus and the apostles were rejected by Paul.

Luke, the exposer of lies

Luke mentions the important name of Pyrrhus

Acts 20:4 to 6

What is awesome is the translator omits the name Pyrrhus

Who was Pyrrhus?
 
Luke wrote of the fool of hope to alert Theophilus knowing that he would draw the parallel between Paul and Pyrrhus. Pyrrhus was according to Homer, a soldier in the trojan horse saga.

2 Cor 13:11
2 Cor 11: 16 to 29

Lukes connection

Acts 23:6
Acts 24:15
Acts 26: 6 &7
Acts 28:20

Even though the omission of Pyrrhus was made, Acts 20:4 mentions the name.

The Darby, New Revised Standard, Latin Vulgate include Pyrrhus.

Luke wrote

Acts 19:38
Acts 20:1 to 6

Lukes use of specific locations and Plutarchs words suggest a purpose.

Lukes primary purpose was to use,allegory to tell a message being suppressed.

One could use Philos allegory rule #19
 
By infiltrating, claiming conversion, and assigning apostle to himself, Paul who never revealed his birth name Saul changed forever all evidence of the Nazarine sect.

If not for Luke revealing Pauls birth name of Saul, we would never know that Josephus accused Saulus of the stoning death of James.

Saulus was the great grandson of Herod the Great. Josephus Antiquities Book 20:9 1 to 4
 
Lukes allegorical message of Saul.

Luke 1:68 to 73

Who is the enemy?

The verses Luke quotes verbatim is Psalm 18 & 1 Sam 22:1.

How does Luke end his second volume?

In the vouce of Paul
Acts 28:26 & 27

Isaiah 6:9 & 10

What is missing from Lukes allegorical message?

Isaiah 6: 11 to 13

The tree of life, an important nazarine teaching Rev 22:14 to 16

The message?

Luke makes it clear that Saul who is Paul weilded an axe andvdestroyed the yree of lifevwhich is now a stump.
 
OE:
Paul and James do not contradict. They supplement. Paul is trying to show that no amount of works can save you if you do not have faith. James is trying to show that no amount of faith can save you if you don't have works. Those are not contradictions. An action that is not of faith is sin. A faith that does not cause you to act is dead. They are talking about different aspects of the same topic.

What do you think of 2 Peter 3:15 NASB - and regard the patience of our Lord as - Bible Gateway ?

Didn't Luke travel with Paul and write about the good things Paul did? You lost me somewhere in all your allegories. Luke used allegory sparingly, his is primarily a historical account. I am not sure where you are coming from.

Btw, Luke, Acts and James are my favorite NT books too. Also, Ecclesiastes and Esther are my favorite OT books. No point, just sayin'.
 
So it begins. I will start by saying, Luke and James are my favorites books in the bible.

Having said this, did Peter, James and the authentic apostles accept Paul as one of them?

Did the followers of the apostles accept Pauls teaching?

Just for giggles

Romans 9:1
2 Cor 11.:31
Gal 1:19 20
1 Tim 2:7

Paul argued his faith was aunthentic to Christs, but James disagrees, James 2:14 to 17.

Part 1

Ok. I've read the above verses. Im not shocked yet but I am a little intrigued about what you are going to say next.
 
What are you're honest thoughts on this, OE?

Can you refute it?

Its the best I could swing with 10 minutes.

Ive always thought Pyrrhus was odd, to make a connection to achilles son is too far a stretch but a fun one.

Also, it is easy when Luke directly quotes the ot.

From historical text, Paul does seem to reject nazarune tradition.......but who knows
 

VN Store



Back
Top