Same here. It's hard for me to remember who was good 3+ years ago (outside the usual suspects Georgia, Bama, Clemson, Ohio State)Also its the past 10 years, so there's a lot of recency bias for me(I can only really remember the last 3-4 at best).
Also its the past 10 years, so there's a lot of recency bias for me(I can only really remember the last 3-4 at best).
I don't like saying this because I find Drinkwitz to be quite obnoxious, but Missouri is probably the most unfairly crapped on program of the last 10-12 years. Our own fans do it a lot.Not listing ones already mentioned.
As much as I hate to say it, I'd say Missouri on the under. Washington on the under.
Oklahoma the last few years on the over. Miami on the over. This is a stab, because I can't remember how they rank preseason, but Kentucky on the over.
Hell, I felt that way about them when they joined. I thought the only thing they brought to the table was TV markets. I don't recall them being great shakes in the Big 12 or whatever it was.I don't like saying this because I find Drinkwitz to be quite obnoxious, but Missouri is probably the most unfairly crapped on program of the last 10-12 years. Our own fans do it a lot.
Since entering the SEC, they are 47-51 in conference play with 2 SEC East titles. That is the 3rd best winning % in what used to be the SEC East, behind only UGA and UF. I remember there being a lot of "Mizzou is going to be the next Vandy" predictions when they entered.
Notre Dame absolutely has to be in the top 10 most overrated. I'd say Texas is there too, as is probably USC.
Underrated is harder. Wisconsin comes to mind.
Edit - I clicked the source. To not spoil it for everyone else, the position of one of the teams I mentioned is very surprising.
Yes - Tennessee being awful until a couple of years ago definitely helped them out a lot. UF has been very up and down as well. 2 of the 3 traditional powers in the SEC East haven't been great since 2012, and that vacuum is going to be filled somehow. Even considering those things though, they've done better than I anticipated. I never expected them to be another Vandy, but I didn't expect them to be better than South Carolina and that much better than UK.Hell, I felt that way about them when they joined. I thought the only thing they brought to the table was TV markets. I don't recall them being great shakes in the Big 12 or whatever it was.
But I was wrong. Of course, us going through a historically bad stretch helped out quite a bit.
That perception (and my own) could be a relic of the late 90s and 2000s. They fairly routinely finished below their preseason ranking during the Davie/Willingham/Weis years. They were also pretty overrated the last 3 years of Lou Holtz.So Ryen Russillo talked about this on his podcast and Notre Dame compared to their preseason rankings actually isn't overrated.
Since 2010, they've only been preseason top 10 five times and yet they've finished top 15 in the polls nine times.
lol, I think a lot of people would take issue with that characterization after last year.#1 has to be someone that is consistently highly ranked year after year, I would think. I'm pondering where to put a team like Oregon, who has had some success, or a team like Florida State who went through some bad spots, but still has been something of a media darling.
It's probably not who you'd think.#1 has to be someone that is consistently highly ranked year after year, I would think. I'm pondering where to put a team like Oregon, who has had some success, or a team like Florida State who went through some bad spots, but still has been something of a media darling.
It's probably not who you'd think.
They actually did cross my mind (not as #1, but perhaps in the top 10 or 20) but I decided against naming them because they also, in the list 10-15 years, have had really good seasons where they began the season unranked. I thought those would kind of cancel out, but I guess not.They weren't even on my radar.
Understood. My issue is bias and memory. I don't remember the pre season polls very well and I already have a bias against certain teams who preseason strong.They actually did cross my mind (not as #1, but perhaps in the top 10 or 20) but I decided against naming them because they also, in the list 10-15 years, have had really good seasons where they began the season unranked. I thought those would kind of cancel out, but I guess not.
You got Ohio State, Arizona, and Cinci correct.USCw over
Tennessee over
Texas over
Clemson over
notre dame over
Ohio State over
Kentucky over
not sure on the timing exactly, but Stanford I would think was over rated at points.
Boise over, its been a while since Petersen was there.
Ped State over
Miami over
Florida over
Auburn under maybe
kansas state under
Washington under
arizona under
utah under
Oklahoma State under
Cinci under
Iowa State Under
Maryland under
Wisconsin under
michigan under
SMU on the under maybe.