BigOrangeAl 1979
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2019
- Messages
- 4,198
- Likes
- 5,543
You can definitely argue that Lincoln Riley (and Bob Stoops before him) has had a lot of letdowns on big stages, but overrated is a strong word.Oklahoma and Lincoln Riley are tremendously overrated I mean they don’t call them Chokelahoma for nothing and of course Jimbo
Oklahoma should have more than 1 title since 2000. Stoops should’ve won at least a couple more with all the talent he hadYou can definitely argue that Lincoln Riley (and Bob Stoops before him) has had a lot of letdowns on big stages, but overrated is a strong word.
And the performance of their program throughout history is definitely not overrated - they've had multiple periods that were wildly successful (under Bud Wilkinson, Barry Switzer, Bob Stoops, and now Riley), which is more than a ton of other schools can say. 7 titles since 1950.
Never had a good enough defense. I haven't been quite able to figure out if that was his fault, or if that's a structural problem that Oklahoma (and the rest of the Big 12 schools for that matter) has to deal with in terms of not being able to recruit enough good athletes on the defensive side of the ball.Oklahoma should have more than 1 title since 2000. Stoops should’ve won at least a couple more with all the talent he had
He hasn't had the talent to win it all. ND isn't the easiest place to recruit to. His BCSNCG appearance and CFP appearance are really nice achievements, and he's only had one truly bad year there (2016).I feel like he’s had the talent to win it all but always came up short when it mattered.
I wouldn't go as far to say OU fans weren't torn up over Veneables leaving. We'd love to have him back now and would have then too. One thing I do hold against Bob Stoops was bringing his brother back in and putting him in as co-DC with Veneables when Venables was holding his own just fine. Plus having an old DC like Bob looking over your shoulder the whole time probably wasn't the best.Never had a good enough defense. I haven't been quite able to figure out if that was his fault, or if that's a structural problem that Oklahoma (and the rest of the Big 12 schools for that matter) has to deal with in terms of not being able to recruit enough good athletes on the defensive side of the ball.
It's weird how somebody like Brent Venables could be there for so long and thought of as a good DC, but ultimately kind of an underachiever (Oklahoma fans weren't exactly torn up to see him leave), then go to Clemson, dramatically improve their defense, and become the hottest DC in all of college football.
You're kind of making my point for me. It would appear that way on paper, which makes their perpetual top 20 or better AP ranking even more impressive.
I've taken the liberty of finding their 247 Composite ranking since 2010. Compare this to their on-the-field performance, and I think you'll see it's pretty impressive:
2010: 46th (8th Big Ten)
2011: 44th (9th Big Ten)
2012: 65th (14th Big Ten)
2013: 40th (7th Big Ten)
2014: 32nd (5th Big Ten)
2015: 41st (6th Big Ten)
2016: 35th (6th Big Ten)
2017: 39th (7th Big Ten)
2018: 45th (9th Big Ten)
2019: 29th (6th Big Ten)
Since 2010, they've had the 8th best class in their conference on average. They are much, much better than 8th best in the Big Ten over that same period.
I already am on record as saying that I like Wisconsin's coach....he's a class guy....
But that doesn't change the fact that Wisconsin is ALWAYS OVER-RATED and RANKED TOO HIGH in the polls.....THEY LOST TO UNRANKED ILLINOIS THIS YEAR!!!!!!
They had 3 losses and still were ranked higher than Alabama and Auburn in the week 16 playoff committee polls!!! WHAT A JOKE!!!
I honestly can't deal with complete idiots who know nothing but STATS and RANKINGS on this site.
You are trying to convince me with RECRUITING RANKINGS??? How did that help them against Illinois????
Wisconsin plays in a WEAK conference against NOBODY...until OCTOBER rolls around...
So all they have to do is win a few games early...and everybody is rushing to declare them top 10 material...just like Notre Dame.
Wisconsin lost 4 games this year--- 1 to UNRANKED Illinois...and by 1 to the PAC-12 champ---which Auburn beat on a Neutral field with a true FR QB starting in his first game...
3 loss Wisconsin was ranked ahead of both Auburn and Alabama in the week 16 football playoff rankings.....complete stupidity!
Just who in the HELL qualifies as Wisconsin's quality win this year???? 15th ranked Iowa by 2.....18th ranked Michigan at home by 21????? (Whom Alabama happened to beat by 19 on a neutral site!!!!!).
SO--not just NO!...BUT HELL NO they're NOT IMPRESSIVE....
They play in a weak conference that the pollsters adore because of their SEC hatred....and rank them as high as possible when they NEVER WIN anything!
THE same can be said for OKLAHOMA.....they have won NOTHING since 2000....play in an extremely weak conference...barely beat Baylor....who UGA completely dominated and beat by double digits!!!
Mike you may want to step away from the computer for a bit. It’s just sports man, calm down.I already am on record as saying that I like Wisconsin's coach....he's a class guy....
But that doesn't change the fact that Wisconsin is ALWAYS OVER-RATED and RANKED TOO HIGH in the polls.....THEY LOST TO UNRANKED ILLINOIS THIS YEAR!!!!!!
They had 3 losses and still were ranked higher than Alabama and Auburn in the week 16 playoff committee polls!!! WHAT A JOKE!!!
I honestly can't deal with complete idiots who know nothing but STATS and RANKINGS on this site.
You are trying to convince me with RECRUITING RANKINGS??? How did that help them against Illinois????
Wisconsin plays in a WEAK conference against NOBODY...until OCTOBER rolls around...
So all they have to do is win a few games early...and everybody is rushing to declare them top 10 material...just like Notre Dame.
Wisconsin lost 4 games this year--- 1 to UNRANKED Illinois...and by 1 to the PAC-12 champ---which Auburn beat on a Neutral field with a true FR QB starting in his first game...
3 loss Wisconsin was ranked ahead of both Auburn and Alabama in the week 16 football playoff rankings.....complete stupidity!
Just who in the HELL qualifies as Wisconsin's quality win this year???? 15th ranked Iowa by 2.....18th ranked Michigan at home by 21????? (Whom Alabama happened to beat by 19 on a neutral site!!!!!).
SO--not just NO!...BUT HELL NO they're NOT IMPRESSIVE....
They play in a weak conference that the pollsters adore because of their SEC hatred....and rank them as high as possible when they NEVER WIN anything!
THE same can be said for OKLAHOMA.....they have won NOTHING since 2000....play in an extremely weak conference...barely beat Baylor....who UGA completely dominated and beat by double digits!!!
Are you on cocaine?I already am on record as saying that I like Wisconsin's coach....he's a class guy....
But that doesn't change the fact that Wisconsin is ALWAYS OVER-RATED and RANKED TOO HIGH in the polls.....THEY LOST TO UNRANKED ILLINOIS THIS YEAR!!!!!!
They had 3 losses and still were ranked higher than Alabama and Auburn in the week 16 playoff committee polls!!! WHAT A JOKE!!!
I honestly can't deal with complete idiots who know nothing but STATS and RANKINGS on this site.
You are trying to convince me with RECRUITING RANKINGS??? How did that help them against Illinois????
Wisconsin plays in a WEAK conference against NOBODY...until OCTOBER rolls around...
So all they have to do is win a few games early...and everybody is rushing to declare them top 10 material...just like Notre Dame.
Wisconsin lost 4 games this year--- 1 to UNRANKED Illinois...and by 1 to the PAC-12 champ---which Auburn beat on a Neutral field with a true FR QB starting in his first game...
3 loss Wisconsin was ranked ahead of both Auburn and Alabama in the week 16 football playoff rankings.....complete stupidity!
Just who in the HELL qualifies as Wisconsin's quality win this year???? 15th ranked Iowa by 2.....18th ranked Michigan at home by 21????? (Whom Alabama happened to beat by 19 on a neutral site!!!!!).
SO--not just NO!...BUT HELL NO they're NOT IMPRESSIVE....
They play in a weak conference that the pollsters adore because of their SEC hatred....and rank them as high as possible when they NEVER WIN anything!
THE same can be said for OKLAHOMA.....they have won NOTHING since 2000....play in an extremely weak conference...barely beat Baylor....who UGA completely dominated and beat by double digits!!!
The reason people say Ferentz is because a decade ago he was one of the highest paid coaches in the country and winning “only” 8 games a year. If you actually look at his results, he’s been a damn good coach. I mean people would never call Hayden Fry overrated, but Ferentz has the same winning percentage as Fry did at Iowa.Agree on Michigan, Notre Dame, and Texas.
Disagree on Holtz. He succeeded nearly everywhere he went, including turning South Carolina from a doormat into a regular bowl team. He should be in the Hall of Fame for his work at Arkansas alone, as well as Notre Dame; all the rest is just gravy.
Strongly disagree on Frank Beamer and Kirk Ferentz.
Let's be honest, Iowa should be a cellar dweller. Not a strong brand. Not much of a recruiting base. They're only competitive because they've made good coaching hires historically. Ferentz could've done a lot more at a program with resources and competitive advantages.
Beamer took a crap VT program and came very close to turning it into a national title program with Michael Vick.
Though, back to Michigan ... the fact that Michigan's program is historically overrated is exactly why Jim Harbaugh is underrated as coach there. The perception that Michigan is an easy job is a very inaccurate one. Harbaugh, if anything, has been one of its best coaches historically; albeit, he's not been able to get over the hump yet.
Are you on cocaine?
I posted recruiting rankings because those say Wisconsin recruits at a level that should put them around the bottom third in their conference, yet they are consistently in the top third of their conference and a top 20 or so team nationally. Yeah, so they lost to Illinois this year...that's one game. Look at their on-field performance relative to the resources they have and their recruiting rankings over a longer period of time...like 10+ seasons. It's pretty good. Wisconsin "should be" one of those teams that just tries to make a bowl every year...they do much better than that.
OU made the playoffs more times than they beat the Vols since 2000.
Just sayin.