Mueller Report Imminent

[volfanhill]

Don't know, but he has been a Never Trumper since the primaries.

Then why did he meet with Trump multiple times during the transition? Why does he claim he and trump have been friends for 30 years?

 

[McDad]

Mueller is a hack pure and simple. "if we had confidence that the President did not commit crime we would've said so".

The job of the special counsel is to determine whether there is enough evidence sufficient to prosecute, not to prove innocence. This is a perversion of our justice system.

This is what I find so odd about the whole thing. His quote is leading to a conclusion. But he doesn't outright articulate the conclusion even though he has the responsibility to do so. His quote should have been: "our responsibility was to gather evidence and make a recommendation to prosecute if the evidence warranted". I have no idea if "confidence" by a special prosecutor holds any legal weight at all.

 

[Orangeburst]

"hack" LOL

The special counsel was tasked with collecting facts, e literally said he could not charge or recommend charges per policy. It's congresses job to decide if a prosecution is warranted and to make that recommendation to Senate through impeachment. This really isn't that hard to understand.

Ken Starr has no problem with indictment. Why is this different?

 

[NorthDallas40]

Then why did he meet with Trump multiple times during the transition? Why does he claim he and trump have been friends for 30 years?

You thinking of Nap or DiGenovia?

 

[BigOrangeD]

It shouldn’t be done. The Muell needs to have his ass drug in front of Congress and answer under oath. If he ignores the subpoena then cite his ass for contempt.

Bring on the Horowitz Report and the Declassified Docs. I'm sure he will have to testify to someone before it's all said and done.

 

[RockyTop85]

Eh not gonna buy that either. Just read it, he actually referenced “insufficient evidence”. C’mon man this wasn’t anywhere near a total exhortation rant.

He said he was “innocent.” Which is at least synonymous with “exoneration.”

I didn’t call it a rant.

 

[volfanhill]

You thinking of Nap or DiGenovia?

Nap

 

[Orangeburst]

It shouldn’t be done. The Muell needs to have his ass drug in front of Congress and answer under oath. If he ignores the subpoena then cite his ass for contempt.

Do not count on it now. The muddier the water the better

 

[Septic]

It shouldn’t be done. The Muell needs to have his ass drug in front of Congress and answer under oath. If he ignores the subpoena then cite his ass for contempt.

Careful what you ask for. I really don't think you'd like what he have to say if required to answer questions without a filter.

 

[NorthDallas40]

He said he was “innocent.” Which is at least synonymous with “exoneration.”

I didn’t call it a rant.

Guess we’re each looking through our own glasses then

 

[NorthDallas40]

Careful what you ask for. I really don't think you'd like what he have to say if required to answer questions without a filter.

Bring it on. Right damn now.

 

[1972 Grad]

You thinking of Nap or DiGenovia?

All those Italians look alike with their hair greased back.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Nap

Ok didn’t remember him saying that but did on Joe D.

 

[hog88]

Ken Starr has no problem with indictment. Why is this different?

Starr didn't indict the president, he presented his conclusions to the House and they impeached him. Starr was at least forthright enough to make definitive conclusions.

 

[n_huffhines]

Ken Starr has no problem with indictment. Why is this different?

He disobeyed JD guidelines.

Edit: he didn't indict Clinton, but he disagrees with the JD guidelines

 

[RockyTop85]

Ken Starr has no problem with indictment. Why is this different?

Ken Starr’s authority was delegated by Congress when they appointed him with the Independent Counsel act. He was not subject to DOJ guidelines.

Also, he never indicted Clinton, IIRC, Clinton was impeached. By Congress.

 

[Septic]

Ken Starr has no problem with indictment. Why is this different?

here you go.

 

[1972 Grad]

Nap

Nap turned on Trump when Trump wouldn't pardon his friend and didn't appoint Nap to the SC.

 

[theFallGuy]

Is this still a thing?

 

[1972 Grad]

Anyone with the slightest criticism of this president is a never Trumper in your all's book.

Nap has been pretty hostile towards Trump.

 

[volfanhill]

Ok didn’t remember him saying that but did on Joe D.

Fox News analyst responds to Trump attack: 'This is the way you treat your friends?'


Napolitano told friends he was on Trump's Supreme Court shortlist

 

[Stew Cook]

It shouldn’t be done. The Muell needs to have his ass drug in front of Congress and answer under oath. If he ignores the subpoena then cite his ass for contempt.

subpoena schmapena... those don't mean anything, right?

 

[volfanhill]

Nap turned on Trump when Trump wouldn't pardon his friend and didn't appoint Nap to the SC.

That is Trumps version of events

 

[zaqhhh]

Nap has been pretty hostile towards Trump.

*Towards Trump's actions when they have been illegal and or indisputably ridiculous

 

[NorthDallas40]

subpoena schmapena... those don't mean anything, right?

On AG Barr probably not. A “private citizen” Mr Mueller? ...