Mueller Report Imminent

Does everyone on the left believe this now or just the ones that have fully bought in to the MSM narrative?

Anyone who disagrees with the liberal narrative isn’t even human.
I specifically said Ryan Saavedra is not a human. He is a terribly dishonest plagiarizing weasel, but my claim of his inhumanity comes from his recurring suggestion that there needs to be a wholesale extermination of the Muslim people in the form of a “Modern Christian Crusade”. That makes him a non-human in my eyes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Tiger
I specifically said Ryan Saavedra is not a human. He is a terribly dishonest plagiarizing weasel, but my claim of his inhumanity comes from his recurring suggestion that there needs to be a wholesale extermination of the Muslim people in the form of a “Modern Christian Crusade”. That makes him a non-human in my eyes.
What do you call the Muslims that want to slit your throat just because you're an American?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
If you read what you quoted from my post, how could you possibly come to the conclusion that "he was very comfortable"? He sounds like he had questions/doubts about whether bias was involved in the Page FISA application.

When asked if he would have submitted the Page FISA renewal applications using the information that the FBI employed, Horowitz responded, “I would not have submitted the one they put in. No doubt about it. It had no business going in.”

“We’re the only IG that can’t review conduct of all the employees in our organization, including attorneys.” -Horowitz

Inspector General was unable to interview former FBI Director James Comey in relation to “classified details” because “Comey chose not to have his security clearances reinstated for our interview.”

Sen. Graham: So when we get defensively briefed tomorrow, would it be okay for FBI agents to open up 302s on what we said?​
Horowitz: We have very significant concerns about that.​

Taking all the above and my previous post that you quoted, does he sound "comfortable" to you?
I think I’ve covered the concept that the errors in the FISA are not ok with me. I don’t have a cop fetish, or a universal trust of every FBI agent just because they’re on the payroll. I specifically said that the 35,000 person organization, that employed over a million documents on this case, was found to have acted without institutional bias. The FBI is bipartisan, and contains many Trump voters. Spend a weekend in the upper neck on the Chesapeake, and tell me about the liberal dark staters you met at the beach. The FBI leans pretty conservative. There was no institutional bias. That was the finding. Horowitz couldn’t discern the intent of an individual who changed a line on an email about a FISA warrant. I can’t discern it, nor can you. That intent of that individual in that moment is not ideological peanut butter that you can spread across the other 35,000 people. The crime of the accused and his intent is very easy to understand. I’d focus on that. I’m sure we’ll get more information on why the FISA app was diddled. It won’t change the facts of the case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN Ribs
I think I’ve covered the concept that the errors in the FISA are not ok with me. I don’t have a cop fetish, or a universal trust of every FBI agent just because they’re on the payroll. I specifically said that the 35,000 person organization, that employed over a million documents on this case, was found to have acted without institutional bias. The FBI is bipartisan, and contains many Trump voters. Spend a weekend in the upper neck on the Chesapeake, and tell me about the liberal dark staters you met at the beach. The FBI leans pretty conservative. There was no institutional bias. That was the finding. Horowitz couldn’t discern the intent of an individual who changed a line on an email about a FISA warrant. I can’t discern it, nor can you. That intent of that individual in that moment is not ideological peanut butter that you can spread across the other 35,000 people. The crime of the accused and his intent is very easy to understand. I’d focus on that. I’m sure we’ll get more information on why the FISA app was diddled. It won’t change the facts of the case.
No one that I know of, in this forum or outside it, has claimed that the entire FBI is biased. But you can bet that there were some, who were in leadership positions, that were.

That ain't peanut butter that you're spreading.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
I think any individual encouraging the extermination of a race, religion or nation has lost their humanity. I’m not quoting ISIS in my arguments. He did quite Saavedra.
Yet you automatically assumed everyone knew what you were talking about.

I had no clue Saavedra said anything of the sort.

Quoting him would have been a good start.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Vol1321
No one that I know of, in this forum or outside it, has claimed that the entire FBI is biased. But you can bet that there were some, who were in leadership positions, that were.

That ain't peanut butter that you're spreading.
No one that I know of, in this forum or outside it, has claimed that the entire FBI is biased. But you can bet that there were some, who were in leadership positions, that were.

That ain't peanut butter that you're spreading.
Worth a read:
Opinion | I Headed the F.B.I. and C.I.A. There’s a Dire Threat to the Country I Love.
 
—And it would be hard to find a less credible person than Kallstrom.
Oh, I don't know.
How about this guy?

iu
 

VN Store



Back
Top