Neylandsmaxims
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
- Messages
- 425
- Likes
- 0
Great post. This offense reminds me alot of Oregon. With the no huddle, you essentially tie the defense's hands, a bit. Limit their ability to substitute. Giving you a chance to get the looks or match-ups you want. Plus, as with Oregon, it has a tendacy to cause fatigue. Fatigue causes mental mistakes, and poor tackling. Then you get the big plays.
My only concern is this......wouldn't the no-huddle approach only amplify our defensive struggles, by lengthening the time they spend on the field?
Of course, "no-huddle" doesn't necessarily mean "Hurry Up". I'm sure a good coach, has a feel for the game. If his defense just got off the field, after a long 14 play, 8 minute drive, he might change the offensive pace. But Dooley did not. Many times, the defense would make a stop or force a fg. following a long drive. Then the offense would go no-huddle, throw three incomplete passes, and give it right back to them. That is just poor management.
My only concern is this......wouldn't the no-huddle approach only amplify our defensive struggles, by lengthening the time they spend on the field?
Of course, "no-huddle" doesn't necessarily mean "Hurry Up". I'm sure a good coach, has a feel for the game. If his defense just got off the field, after a long 14 play, 8 minute drive, he might change the offensive pace. But Dooley did not. Many times, the defense would make a stop or force a fg. following a long drive. Then the offense would go no-huddle, throw three incomplete passes, and give it right back to them. That is just poor management.