Nice read for sure... I got a few questions though.
1. What happens if Bajakian doesn't come to Tennessee? With Jones/Bajakian being as HC/OC for 6 years, you can't ignore the fact that maybe, just maybe, that the offense philosophy is more on Bajakian. Jones doesn't call plays either.
2. Why is the "big board"/non-huddle better than the traditional ways of signal calling/huddling? Can't the defense figure out what plays they are calling? Also, that means that every player has to remember there roles. I could imagine that some players forget or get confused. With a huddle, the QB can reassure his players.
I think we know the answer to the first question,
I think it is a combination of both. Boards, checking at the line, an offense revolving around concision. This is all the rage for a these one-back teams that are often typified as "Spread." I can remember years ago at one-back clinics were coaches were coming up with stuff like this. Kevin Sumlin, Noel Mazzone, Leach, etcetera. They were all labeled as outcasts by the old-guard of coaches. You know, the ones that refuse to budge from two-back, 21 personnel. The same coaches that find themselves out of jobs or forced to adapt.
Offenses are directing their entire game plan around going fast as of late. We aren't talking about Chad Johnson fast. We're talking about Ricky Bobby fast.
No huddle does a few things:
1. Takes a visiting crowd noise out of the game with tempo. Crowds are taught to get loud at the LOS and snap-count. It is a slow anticipation from the breaking of the huddle.
2. Controls personnel and substitutions of the other team. You're forcing them to play what you want.
3. It eliminates defensive celebration. When the other team gets a big play, no-huddle teams are lined up and ready to snap.
4. Plays faster than a defense can react to. If the opponent is off-balance, much of the game planning and scheme is null.
5. Allows for coaches to read defenses and audible from the sidelines. If the coaching staff sees the corners off and a 1-High look, chances are you're going to get some form a Cover 3 shell. Whether that is a buzz, invert/sky, or any other tag, the coaches can eliminate a lot of things for the quarterback. The main reason this is most valuable? The headset is cut off after a certain time limit. The offense is only going to see signals.
I think images relay plays better to the players than verbose, descriptive play calls relayed from the booth. Rather than Double Wing Rt 2 Jet Under '40' Alert, the player may see Tom Brady which represents the Patriots. The P is associated with the concept, "Power," and thus allows for a quick recognition. Bubble screen may be the Boston College logo. And the passes may identify with college teams and runs being NFL teams. The reason this is confusing for the defense to decipher is the idea of the board being "Hot." The first signaler a. will relay to the team that the board is the play being ran, or b. disregard the board because the other signaler is calling the play. In truth, you could possibly have 3 different objects sending out a play call. 1. The board 2. Signaler no 2. and 3. Signaler 3. The first signaler gives the play side and tells which is live, while the other two could be giving dummy or live calls. Most of the concepts are easily defined and associated with words, mascots, or people. This is in contrast to numbers and descriptive words that give every detail of the play in the huddle.
Awesome post. Thank you so much for taking such time to educate 99% of us who want to judge CBJ on name recognition. If all Vol fans would take judt a bit of time to read this, it would bring ALOT more respect. Thanks BAM. Awesome effort. You are a TRUE Vol fan. Ive been onboard with CBJ by the way.
Thanks, I love this university and program.
This looks like a write up over at smartfootball ...... Good analysis. A great running back that can cut back under over pursuing lb's after constant probing of the flank will do us wonders.
How did you know? I love Chris Brown. Excellent, excellent writer.
Great insight. Thanks for posting.
Question: how does Bray fit into offense, and if it is geared more towards a dual threat QB(peterman) can it be tweaked short term to fit a pocket passer (Bray)
Edit- only took me 5 years to get 500 post, but I've got about 10,000 reads
I think Bray would find a way. Much of what Chaney did originated with ideas formulated by Joe Tiller and Scott Linehan. Coincidentally, Tiller and Linehan were both one-back guys. Linehan being a Petrino/Erickson guy and Tiller sort of coming to his own branch. The vertical stemmed passing game isn't too far off from what Chaney had originally planned. I also saw a noticeable divide in yards per attempt and overall passing yards per completion between 2011 and 2012. Simply put, he had different types of quarterbacks who can throw certain routes. Coach Jones can adjust.
Congratulations.