LouderVol
Extra and Terrestrial
- Joined
- May 19, 2014
- Messages
- 53,848
- Likes
- 53,482
Not sure what you're smoking, but I'll take some.
I'm for an equitable sharing of the burden, pure and simple. Outcomes will never be equitable. That's a big reason why burden sharing should be. Say whatever you wish, but it doesn't change that fact.
And who said anything about taxation being used to manipulate society?
My ideas will not only not be defeated, they are your future.
Take a couple more tokes and do a little deep breathing.
No exemptions: Everyone files single.
2% 1 - 25k
5% 25+ - 50
10% 50+ - 100
13% 100+ - 200
15% 200+ - 300
17% 300+ - 400
20% 400+ - 500
25% 500+ - 1 m
30% 1 m+ - 5 m
35% 5 m+ - 20 m
40% 20 m+ - 100 m
45% 100 m+ - 1 b
50% 1 b+
He only pays the increased rate for the portion that is over 300k.Pros: everyone pays something. Lower rates than current system.
Cons: there is no equity (equally shared burden) in your plan; which is your theme.
Consider the poor sap who makes $295k per year and gets a 6k Christmas bonus. He nets less than the lady earning $299k a year. He wonders what the phrase equally shared burden means.
Good.He only pays the increased rate for the portion that is over 300k.
Everyone pays the exact same tax on the first 25k they make. 2%
Everyone pays the exact same tax on the next 25k they make. 5%
Everyone pays the exact same on the next 50k they make. 10%
Everyone pays the exact same on the next 100k they make. 13%
......and so on.
The poor sap who makes 299k and gets a 6k bonus will be fine. He'll have no reason to whine, but probably will anyway.
It's fed people who otherwise would have gone hungry. It's put a roof over the heads of children who otherwise would have been homeless. It's provided job training and placement to people who otherwise would have remained unemployed.Explain to us exactly how government assistance has “helped” since LBJ’s Great Society was introduced.
Be honest.
It's fed people who otherwise would have gone hungry. It's put a roof over the heads of children who otherwise would have been homeless. It's provided job training and placement to people who otherwise would have remained unemployed.
You’re either dishonest or embarrassingly ignorant.It's fed people who otherwise would have gone hungry. It's put a roof over the heads of children who otherwise would have been homeless. It's provided job training and placement to people who otherwise would have remained unemployed.
You’re either dishonest or embarrassingly ignorant.
It’s a proven failure and has created generational poverty and dependency on government assistance.
You should read Thomas Sowell.
A Legacy of Liberalism | National Review
Pros: everyone pays something. Lower rates than current system.
Cons: there is no equity (equally shared burden) in your plan; which is your theme.
Consider the poor sap who makes $295k per year and gets a 6k Christmas bonus. He nets less than the lady earning $299k a year. He wonders what the phrase equally shared burden means.
No he won’t.He only pays the increased rate for the portion that is over 300k.
Everyone pays the exact same tax on the first 25k they make. 2%
Everyone pays the exact same tax on the next 25k they make. 5%
Everyone pays the exact same on the next 50k they make. 10%
Everyone pays the exact same on the next 100k they make. 13%
......and so on.
The poor sap who makes 299k and gets a 6k bonus will be fine. He'll have no reason to whine, but probably will anyway.
You’re consistent in your dishonesty here. You repeatedly submit your opinion as fact and ignore any evidence to the contrary.You asked me to "Explain to us exactly how government assistance has “helped” since LBJ’s Great Society was introduced."
And then was petty enough to add in the insulting "Be honest" nonsense.
My response did just that.
You might want to work on asking a better question if there is a specific answer you are trying to elicit.
That will never happen for the same reason the sales tax will not. the government still wants to reward and punish with the tax code.No deductions no itemization.