NighthawkVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2007
- Messages
- 12,089
- Likes
- 42,679
Uh no you are completely wrong. My wife and I both have had ZERO carbohydrates going on 6 years now. The human body doesn’t need sugar. All in moderation is BS. The human only needs fats and protein. The human body can make all the glucose it ever needs.Uh, no.
Carbs are necessary to regulate your metabolism, for energy, and yes, for muscle building. This all or nothing attitude Americans have about eating is a problem. It’s kind of like our extreme attitudes about everything else. We need carbs. We need proteins. We need sugars. We need calories. Most of all, we need it all in moderation.
The frustrating thing is that on our first drive, we saw what appeared to be our old offense that had worked so well. Crossing routes, TE usage, misdirection, QB runs, etc. Even the TD was a vintage Princeton Fant circa 2022 type play.If our WRs can’t understand screen, screen, run then I don’t know
CJH can definitely get a couple of good shots open a game, but he also struggles with putting together consistent drives that move the chains methodically (unless its a team we can dominate at the LOS).Play calling has been solid this year. Guys running wide open downfield all season. Maybe not in this game (no idea bc I’ve only seen the broadcast version and can’t see downfield).
Where did that come from. Carbs are in almost all foods we eat, not just sugars syrups etc. I have been a diabetic for 35 years and know pretty much what foods I can/should eat .Uh no you are completely wrong. My wife and I both have had ZERO carbohydrates going on 6 years now. The human body doesn’t need sugar. All in moderation is BS. The human only needs fats and protein. The human body can make all the glucose it ever needs.
CJH can definitely get a couple of good shots open a game, but he also struggles with putting together consistent drives that move the chains methodically (unless its a team we can dominate at the LOS).
Early season that’s a viable excuse, but at this point if on your deep shots your QB is regularly missing and your WRs are regularly dropping them when not missed, you can’t run an offense dependent on them. You have to scheme and call plays to what your players are doing well
You can’t run any offense when guys are not executing like catching a football when it hits their hands…no amount of scheme can fix players not executingCJH can definitely get a couple of good shots open a game, but he also struggles with putting together consistent drives that move the chains methodically (unless its a team we can dominate at the LOS).
Early season that’s a viable excuse, but at this point if on your deep shots your QB is regularly missing and your WRs are regularly dropping them when not missed, you can’t run an offense dependent on them. You have to scheme and call plays to what your players are doing well
I’m talking specifically about the dropped/missed deep shots. There’s also a huge chunk of the intermediate pass game that we rarely take advantage of. Slants, drags, deep crossing routes, pre snap motion, etc that all can force the defense out of position. Shortening the passing game is not equivalent to switching to the triple option, that’s a little hyperbolic.Which would be rushing the football. On the season we have 288 pass attempts vs 459 rushing attempts.
If WRs drop balls or the QB overthrows, you’re not gonna be able to run any offense effectively. We’re not switching to the triple option.