LittleVol
Of course I can help you, Coach Heupel.
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2014
- Messages
- 22,104
- Likes
- 38,904
Keyton is 6'3" 195 so I was mistaken about his current weight. Leacock was said to be 6'4" 205 before his senior season started. That is taller and heavier as a high school senior vs a senior in college, albeit 10 pounds as opposed to 15. Leacock was said to be 6'4" 200 lbs back in April of this year, so the 205 stated in August is likely an accurate weight.Nope
So next year the only receiver we lose is Tillman
Bru
Hyatt
Keyton (super sr)
Merrill
Holiday
Calloway
Webb
White
Nimrod
Seldon
Leacock
Spillman
That’s an embarrassment of riches
You may be right, but there is no profile that lists Leacock taller than 6-3 or heavier than 195. I used their respective 247 profiles as evidence of their size. Even at 6-4, though, I'm not sure it changes the comparison. I wouldn't look at Leacock at 6-4 and say he's wholly different than Keyton at 6-3. The possible weight advantage perhaps leads to him being more durable and more able to absorb shots across the middle, but at 205, he isn't remarkably bigger, either. Regardless, hopefully he has more of an impact than Keyton has had.Keyton is 6'3" 195 so I was mistaken about his current weight. Leacock was said to be 6'4" 205 before his senior season started. That is taller and heavier as a high school senior vs a senior in college, albeit 10 pounds as opposed to 15. Leacock was said to be 6'4" 200 lbs back in April of this year, so the 205 stated in August is likely an accurate weight.
You may be right, but there is no profile that lists Leacock taller than 6-3 or heavier than 195. I used their respective 247 profiles as evidence of their size. Even at 6-4, though, I'm not sure it changes the comparison. I wouldn't look at Leacock at 6-4 and say he's wholly different than Keyton at 6-3. The possible weight advantage perhaps leads to him being more durable and more able to absorb shots across the middle, but at 205, he isn't remarkably bigger, either. Regardless, hopefully he has more of an impact than Keyton has had.
Calloway was an awesome CB.I could see Calloway leaving and seldon starting off at RB because of need…that’s still an embarrassment of riches though…especially if we land Trayvon ray as well
When Leacock's profile was made on here in November 2021, he was listed at 6'3" 200. That was his junior year 247 profile. Keyton was 180 when he arrived at UT as a freshman. A 10 pound difference isn't much at some positions, but it makes a big difference at WR.You may be right, but there is no profile that lists Leacock taller than 6-3 or heavier than 195. I used their respective 247 profiles as evidence of their size. Even at 6-4, though, I'm not sure it changes the comparison. I wouldn't look at Leacock at 6-4 and say he's wholly different than Keyton at 6-3. The possible weight advantage perhaps leads to him being more durable and more able to absorb shots across the middle, but at 205, he isn't remarkably bigger, either. Regardless, hopefully he has more of an impact than Keyton has had.
Nothing about the rating but the video I had seen at that time was not impressiveWhy you liking this @sjt18 ?
Pretty sure you were saying a few weeks ago that he had some issues on film, and his 3* rating was justified
Or maybe you don’t interpret the video the same as the scouts. That’s fine.Nothing about the rating but the video I had seen at that time was not impressive
Yes though. He’s dominating very good competition