VOL6479
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 905
- Likes
- 509
Kind of kills the level playing field though. You would have the same 15-20 universities who had the biggest donors stay on top every year. At least a structured environment gives other universities a fighting shot. I will say the NCAA needs to hire full time attorney's to put their stick in the mud interpret and re-write some of their outdated non applicable rules to match the landscape of college sports as of today. After these rules have been agreed upon by the universities presidents they should be enforced with as much uniformity as possible to avoid one school from getting hammered like USC and another school which was even worse with their compliance had to run some laps (I.e. Oregon).
The NCAA is not going to do something to vacate Alabama's NC, or anything else with this.
It would basically make the entire 2012 season invalid. A fake. No way they're letting that happen. And if they did, all of the sudden you'd have people everywhere making accusations like this, or trying to scheme, bribe, blackmail whatever to find where some kid inappropriately got a bottle of gatorade. It would create the impression that the national championship or bowl games were only step one. Step 2 would be hoping no one would make an accusation the following year that one of the players took $$ to make the championship invalid. They can't let that happen.
It is an easy fix. The universities shouldn't have to pay the players. If the player can make money on his own time doing commercials, autographs etc then let him do it. If the top players get paid good for them. If the non revenue sports or lower tier players don't it isn't the schools fault.
And that doesn't happen now??? Really??? Football and to some extent Basketball from the big 5 conferences definitely NEEDS to be broken away and under a different rule. I'm sorry, but I just bristle every time I hear that level playing field stuff because I just find it bunk. Heck they've put a wall up the size of the Great Wall of China to keep mid majors out. Oklahoma State was completely side stepped. Boise State has not had a chance in hell even if they ran the tables.
Fact of the matter is these kids are expected to live in abject poverty while they make people billions. Yes, I understand they are getting an education and that is definitely worth something, but the problem is they literally can't make money in any way as it will be construed as a violation somewhere. And honestly even if they could... how would they have time for a job between school and their sport which are both full time jobs in of themselves. Someone asked how this would solve things? Well, it won't but it sure as hell would make it right in my mind.
With all the other sports, there is no need as those are least still in the spirit of collegiate athletics still, and aren't major businesses like Football and Basketball (again to a smaller extent but it's still a pretty decent revenue generator).
So your solution is to double the wall in size? Like you said they are getting their school paid for and have the opportunity to get a free education. As far as extra money goes, allow them to get a job like most other college kids do and call it a day.
Which is an argument I saw on another forum. Non athletes on scholarship can work with no limitations to how much they make but athletes can not.
I do understand the flip side of would they get special treatment for hires them and how much they are paid, but it does go with the argument about they get a free education it seems they should be treated as any scholarship student and be allowed to earn money if needed. Not sure how to police it and maybe that is why they can not anymore.
I don't know what the answer is, but I do know that so much of these kids time is devoted to football when they aren't in class that it would be very difficult for them to hold down a part time job, or any job. If they did this then their grades would most likely suffer, and then they would not be eligible because they wouldn't have a high enough grade point average. We have to remember that these kids are required to have a certain gpa to be eligible. I believe something needs to be done, but don't know what.