NashVol11
Gloomed to Fail
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2009
- Messages
- 22,755
- Likes
- 7,935
You are saying with a straight face that covering this story is "an attempt to divide" if the left does it but epic awesome protection of others if the right does it. Yikes lolLiberal media tapped out when the facts came out, as I said you can’t defend wanting to kill people. Conservative media went all in on the release of Penny to protect others. Not hard to understand. Common sense won. Take your fake rage elsewhere, maybe back to pink hats.
White educated military man, kills black homeless man. Yes. I don’t make the news cycles, but watch enough to know the agendas. DA Bragg looking for a case here while letting crime of color walk. Child please.You are saying with a straight face that covering this story is "an attempt to divide" if the left does it but epic awesome protection of others if the right does it. Yikes lol
If you “know the agendas” then you’ll eventually realize that the agenda for right wing media, just like the left, is generating clicks/outrage too and not “protecting others” like you naively claimedWhite educated military man, kills black homeless man. Yes. I don’t make the news cycles, but watch enough to know the agendas. DA Bragg looking for a case here while letting crime of color walk. Child please.
I’ll take someone Intervening before someone attacks others, considering their confrontational and agitated behavior, any day of the week. Sometimes wait and see gets others hurt. Mental illness is secondary if there’s a reasonable belief a guy is about to hurt others around you.Said differently, even if he didn’t kill Neely and hell even if Neely were still alive today, it wouldn’t make Penny a “hero” for physically attacking a clearly mentally ill person over words. People just love making everything a culture war thing
from your own quote it says the city examiner didn't wait for the toxicology report. so she literally couldn't mention the drugs if she made her findings before she saw them.You keep saying this based exclusively on one part of one side of the testimony. This is exactly what I was talking about re: taking a defense case at face value
The longer the trial went, the better the conservatives looked. Again. We understand you sympathize with a black male who wished harm and death on others. Sorry for your loss, as the good guys won again.If you “know the agendas” then you’ll eventually realize that the agenda for right wing media, just like the left, is generating clicks/outrage too and not “protecting others” like you naively claimed
Yeah and it’s an absolutely gigantic leap to go from that to “K2 killed him” which neither side said. What are we doing herefrom your own quote it says the city examiner didn't wait for the toxicology report. so she literally couldn't mention the drugs if she made her findings before she saw them.
talk about looking at one side of things.
Fake outrage. They want another George Floyd moment/excuse just to riotIf by this he means a mentally ill person with 42 arrests shouldn't just be running around in public and allowed to openly threaten people on subways. I'd agree. Surely that's what he meant, right? Right?
Yes and on cross the prosecution expert agreeed with the defense experts. Thats why the manslaughter charges were dropped.You keep saying this based exclusively on one part of one side of the testimony. This is exactly what I was talking about re: taking a defense case at face value
Of course right wing media was outraged! Daniel Penny should have been thanked by the Mayor & the City of New York that they are still good people willing do the right thing to protect others. Instead the liberal activist DA arrests him and charges him with murder. Remember the store owner who stabbed a robber in self defense and was also charged and sent to Riker's before overwhelming public pressure forced him to have charges dropped and released him.If you “know the agendas” then you’ll eventually realize that the agenda for right wing media, just like the left, is generating clicks/outrage too and not “protecting others” like you naively claimed
There's definitely a mesh point between "You can't always just assume the worst and resort to physical violence." and "Waiting for the worst to actually begin happening to act is a very poor defensive strategy.". The lean should always go to the person(s) best able to claim defensive action.People who don't want an innocent to act in an escalated situation until violence is attempted against them have never experienced how quickly that violence takes your choices away. In other words, if you wait for someone who's threatening you to actually follow up on it, they almost always get the best of you. Your reflexes are never as good as their first move.
If someone is threatening you, and they're close enough to actually do it (especially if one is trying to retreat and they are closing the gap you're trying to create, or if you have no retreat) then you act first. And that doesn't make you the bad guy.
None of this is true. The judge asked jurors to decide the manslaughter charge and they couldn't, so he dismissed it. That has nothing to do with what "the facts say" regarding cause of deathYes and on cross the prosecution expert agreeed with the defense experts. Thats why the manslaughter charges were dropped.
I get that you want it to be penny’s fault but the facts say he had a lethal dose of drugs in his system and that is why he died.
Tell him thatAnyone with a basic understanding of a rear naked choke knows that when applied correctly you lose consciousness in 4-5 seconds. 1 minute is fatal. Penny absolutely knows how to apply one. He subdued the man but never choked him.
Penny came up behind Neely, grabbed his neck and head, and took him to the floor. The veteran later told police he "just put him in a chokehold" and "put him out" to ensure he wouldn't hurt anyone.