Weezer
VolNation Dalai Lama , VN Most Beloved Poster
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2009
- Messages
- 86,088
- Likes
- 252,283
I'm not completely up to speed on this, but talking ish and throwing trash is not a death sentence. I've seen reports that there is video of a three minute choke-hold, and I've seen reports it went for fifteen minutes. I'd like to know what actually happened.Did he assault people? Yes
Did he commit battery? Yes
While saying he doesn’t mind going to jail for life.
Yes, in totality he’s presenting a clear danger to the people around worthy of being restrained for the safety of others.
You seem like the kind of person who is very uncomfortable around anyone who isn't a Caucasian under the age of 62.I hope you never find yourself facing an imaginary threat. I've ridden on the NYC subway many times when they were deemed "safe" and wasn't very comfortable then, I can only imagine what it's like now.
Only three minutes of the choke hold were recorded, but it was applied some time before the video began.I'm not completely up to speed on this, but talking ish and throwing trash is not a death sentence. I've seen reports that there is video of a three minute choke-hold, and I've seen reports it went for fifteen minutes. I'd like to know what actually happened.
You are wrong. If there is a reasonable fear for life/safety from bodily harm, a person can indeed intervene. Hell, here’s a quick excerpt from USA Today on the subject: “The Manhattan District Attorney's Office is investigating the incident and no charges have been announced.If a case does go forward, an argument of self-defense would likely brush up against a "tricky" legal requirement, according to Mark Bederow, a former assistant district attorney in Manhattan.Under New York's penal code, a person who uses deadly force must not only prove that they feared for their own life or someone else's, but that any reasonable person would have felt the same way.” And that’s just referencing deadly force. Had the marine just restrained him and not ultimately killed him, 100% the marine faces zero charges. But yeah, I believe the marine went too far. The guy went unconscious, other passengers were warning him that he was going to kill the guy, but he still kept the chokehold for 15 minutes or whatever it was. Should’ve let go once Neely went unconscious, he went too far after that point in my opinion. Where are you getting the idea that intervening when someone is threatening to kill you is an “imaginary right”?
I tend to err on the side of "don't choke a guy to death," but I also wonder why a "free lance journalist" would wait twelve minutes to start recording a chokehold on a subway. Additionally, I think a marine would probably know that a chokehold is lethal and he needs to stop at some point.Only three minutes of the choke hold were recorded, but it was applied some time before the video began.
No one on that subway knew his past. It isn't relevant in this situation. And there are no reports of anyone other than Neely suffering injury.
This should be pinned. 615 has written probably 5,000 words at this point and still can’t point to Neely physically harming anyone. Lot of words to say absolutely nothing
I haven't watched the actual video, so I don't know which part of the alleged 15 minutes he filmed. I know it wasn't the first three minutes, but it could have been any part of the alleged allotted time. And I would guess he was caught off guard by the whole thing.I tend to err on the side of "don't choke a guy to death," but I also wonder why a "free lance journalist" would wait twelve minutes to start recording a chokehold on a subway. Additionally, I think a marine would probably know that a chokehold is lethal and he needs to stop at some point.
That's not what I claimed. If they reasonably fear for their life, they have every right to act. But a threat on the subway does not automatically constitute "reasonable", which is what you appear to be arguing. Neely never once acted on his threats. So how were they "reasonably" afraid for their lives?Quit being obtuse. You keep claiming a person has no right to intervene if they fear imminent bodily harm or death, I’m saying prove it.