UTodd01
@tmfawver
- Joined
- May 13, 2008
- Messages
- 4,090
- Likes
- 1,700
The point I am making with the question is that for the general public, there is no memorable Peyton Manning game.
There is no heisman moment.
Personnally, I think the right guy won in 1997.
The point I am making with the question is that for the general public, there is no memorable Peyton Manning game.
There is no heisman moment.
Personnally, I think the right guy won in 1997.
The point I am making with the question is that for the general public, there is no memorable Peyton Manning game.
There is no heisman moment.
Personnally, I think the right guy won in 1997.
The point I am making with the question is that for the general public, there is no memorable Peyton Manning game.
There is no heisman moment.
Personnally, I think the right guy won in 1997.
I don't necessarily disagree. Peyton's biggest game was a loss. Woodson's biggest game was a win because of him.
Ummm, no. You can't say that a regular season SEC game was more important than the SECCG. I don't have a problem with people that think Woodson was also deserving, however. His contributions on offense and special teams were greatly exaggerated by the media though.
Ridiculous on many fronts...the come from behind win in the SECCG vs Auburn would qualify as both a memorable game and a Heisman moment (whatever the hell that means)...Also had great games vs UCLA and Georgia in 1997...it's fine that you think Woodson was deserving and I'm sure some people here would even agree but to disparage Manning is just wrong - he was deserving as well. Can you name a "Heisman moment" from the likes of Eric Crouch, Jason White or Troy Smith?
I'm not knocking Manning.
He was a worthy candidate.
Woodson had a better year. He seemed to make a spectacular play whenever his team needed it when the cameras were there.
We dispute it for many reasons but I think the main reason is (and most people forget this of course) we were fighting for a national title going into the bowl games. The Florida game shouldn't have mattered at that point.
He had his 'moment' in the SEC Championship game that put them in position to win it all.
Of course, UM beat WSU earlier in the day and we went out and laid an egg against Nebraska with nothing to play for. But the Heisman had already been voted on at that point.
We dispute it for many reasons but I think the main reason is (and most people forget this of course) we were fighting for a national title going into the bowl games. The Florida game shouldn't have mattered at that point.
He had his 'moment' in the SEC Championship game that put them in position to win it all.
Of course, UM beat WSU earlier in the day and we went out and laid an egg against Nebraska with nothing to play for. But the Heisman had already been voted on at that point.
The best opponents Peyton played against were Florida and Nebraska and we lost to both of them. The best opponents Woodson played against were Ohio State and Penn State. Against OSU he had an INT and returned the punt. He got a TD against PSU and shut down Jurevicius.
I'm not saying that Peyton is bad or anything, just that I don't think it's nearly the travesty that Vol fans consider it.
I'll also say that my thoughts are more like crusse here.
People act like they gave the heisman to a bum who wasn't a deserving candidate.
Maybe Manning should have won. Fine.
But, he wasn't screwed. Someone who had a fantastic season was voted the winner.
They didn't give the trophy to a scrub.
The Florida game was big not just because Tennessee lost but Manning did not play well. The most memorable moment for the game was the pick 6 he threw.
There are no rules for how someone wins a heisman.
It can be team success, stats, etc.
What was impressive about Woodson was the difference he seemed to make when the ball was so rarely in his hands.
Again, I asked for top 5 games as a vol and two posters only listed 2 games from his 1997 season
Be honest, you had no idea Tennessee, Michigan, and Nebraska were all playing for a NC in the '97 bowl season. Revisionist history leads you to believe it was only Michigan and Nebraska.
My point is, the case most people make against Manning is the Florida game - but at this point (when the Heisman was awarded) it meant exactly nothing.
I remembered that fact just fine. Thank you.
I disagree completely with the other point.
There is no doubt in my mind that if Tennessee had beaten Florida (assuming Manning didn't look like N. Petetman), manning would have won the Heisman.
I think if Manning played like he did in 95 and Tennessee lost, he may have won the Heisman