GUNTERSVOL
VOL FROM BIRTH
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2017
- Messages
- 6,645
- Likes
- 8,882
your talking about 2 kids who most likely would not play just to get from 83 to 85? We are going to have several really good receivers who are on scholarship this coming year get minimal reps in backup roles. I just don't see the point in doing it. They would not get someone that could indeed help.
I just have to believe our staff will have guys that they have evaluated better than their star ratings, not as good as those we prioritize to sign, but good enough to spend a few bucks on and get better and deeper and maybe some late blooming risk/reward winners without breaking the bank. I lobbied for this as a way, if necessary, to add Bishop last year.
In this brave new world, I also CONTINUE to propose we take an alternate route to maximizing our roster by having the collective to work deals for VFL WALK OFFS. Guys that have peaked at scout team level and will accept some non premium NIL money to give up their schollie without getting DEIONED so their COUNTER can be used for new HS or portal additions. Make them trainers or recruiting volunteer analysts, etc. Probably have a shot at better players than the PWO PLUS method.
How much would the staff pay to get to go from 85 to 87 counters? Or for us 83 to 85 or more? There is some limit to value since you can only let 70 get on the plane.
Lots of potential ways to maximize roster with NIL other than the sexy BIG FISH deals.
Not proposing having 20 or so paid PWO’s, but a coupe of ways to replace the risk/reward counter misses without going the mercenary route. Results could be similar. They would simply give us more or better players to yield from without giving up the moral high ground.