I'm so over the ref whining in every single game, ours and others. I thought the refs had one of their better games in this one and had absolutely nothing to do with the outcome. It's possible for one team to have a big edge in free throws and it still be correctly called.
SCs 11 blocks and 22 pts off turnovers, 31-2 bench pt advantage, plus higher fg % had alot more to do with it.
If I thought games were as highly "rigged" as some others seem to think I wouldn't watch. It's why I don't watch wrestling.
WHAT!? You don't watch wrestling, yet you expect to be taken seriously!?
I hope this doesn't read as a poorly disguised rebuttal, but, like you and everyone here, I have watched a lot of basketball games. But, unlike you and probably everyone here, I don't so much watch strategically. I don't "read" defenses and so on. I don't coach from the couch. And, I try to not make officials the issue. They make a lot of bad calls, and sometimes worse, they make a lot of No calls. As we like to say, they "let 'em play." But, are they consistent on both ends of the court? Do they "choose sides?" Generally speaking, No. And, there are three officials involved, after all, so that alone makes for an unlikely conspiracy.
All this to say, I agree with you that, generally speaking, cheating is not a problem. And, "rigging," which would involve one or more officials (and likely a very influential "outside" source), is another thing altogether. So, "cheating," by definition, is intentional. It almost never happens.
Almost.
OTOH, you're no doubt aware that officials have actually done time in prison for their misadventures. They have, indeed, admitted to cheating. Something about money (And, keeping their children alive); so, again, a whole different subject, from a whole different world. So, NO, I do not think that officials cheat.
However, they have tendencies, be they from bias or otherwise. Let's use Vanderbilt: We all know enough about the game to understand that leaving shooters open, throwing the ball to the other team, failing to box out, etc., will lose more games than a missed call by the official. We lost that game through our performance. But, we also know that the Vanderbilt guards extended, and even pushed off time and time again. A couple calls to correct that one obvious behavior would likely, literally have changed the outcome.
Texas? They're good to very good. And we played quite well. We were probably the most-consistent, for four quarters of all our games to date. We lost due to the occasional lack of focus, and several missed assignments. But again, they spent a lot of time in the paint, and appeared from my point of view, to play with reckless abandon. These things will occur at the official's discretion.
So, no, I do not believe that officiating has (intentionally) cost us a single loss; especially with so many things we didn't do right, or the many things we did wrong, or failed to do altogether. But, I believe that the "way" a game is officiated can, and often does affect the outcome.