The student newspaper story prompted one backlash, which triggered another. The serious, confirmed allegations of some ex-players matter, and it seems like accountability and reforms are definitely in order. But the impassioned denials and defenses of many other Wildcat players, past and present, also matter. Quite a few of them are charging that the whistleblowers are distorting the facts and dramatically embellishing the resulting harm. With an imperfect, partial view of what actually happened, and the severity of the hazing, it's impossible for me to render a clear-eyed judgment about the firing. I'm open to the notion that after extremely poor seasons in three of the last four years, coupled with this stain on his 'Wildcat Way' preaching, Fitz deserved to lose his job. I'm also open to the idea that a more fitting form of discipline would have stopped well short of outright termination, even if the initial two-week glorified vacation was woefully insufficient.