BigPapaVol
Wave yo hands in the aiya
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2005
- Messages
- 63,225
- Likes
- 14
I have read the editorial. Have you?
What is the actual meaningful difference between what Romney endorsed and what Obama did?
Clue: No difference.
It is not his position now which is what you suggested. Just as Obama has changed his positions Romney has here. Yet you keep repeating it as if his position favors the mandate as in ACA.
Just reread it and no where does he say the Federal SHOULD adopt the Mass plan. He uses the Mass plan as an example of how they handled it and later in the editorial he suggests other alternatives that could be used to address the cost issue.
His message is 1) we don't need single payer, 2) we don't need a rush job bill with lots of special favors, 3) controlling costs is key and bromides like "electronic medical records" are not enough.
Bull crap. And you know it. He expressly suggests that Obama ought to adopt an individual mandate at the national level.
show it. Unless you are going to weasel around what "suggests" means.
the editorial says the US "could learn" from what they did in Mass.
In the ending paragraph where he gives Obama guidance about doing HC reform he never even alludes to the mandate. Even in his description of Mass he talks about incentives and suggests that how Mass did it is only one way.
Actually, depending on which day you ask him, he likes the individual mandate, too. Or its socialist. Or it was his idea. Or it should be up to the states. Or it should be done by the feds. Or its good. Or its bad.
In Mitts own words:
Romney: I oppose a Federal mandate.
Romney: I support Wyden Bennett
In debate:
Moderator to Romney:
You have backed away from a federal mandate on a national level.
Romey: No No I like mandates
Romney: What we did with healtcare in MA is a ultimate conservative plan.
Who even cares if it IS double speak at this point? I know one guy is diving into an empty pool head first and the other guy is vowing to repeal it. It's an easy choice for me.
"Well of course I'm going to repeal Obamacare," Romney said. "I've said that on the campaign trail, I think, every single day. Obamacare must be repealed -- in its entirety. It's bad policy, it's bad law, and frankly, a $2 trillion entitlement we don't want and we certainly can't afford.... Obamacare is a disaster in my opinion, and has to be repealed entirely."
Who even cares if it IS double speak at this point? I know one guy is diving into an empty pool head first and the other guy is vowing to repeal it. It's an easy choice for me.
Romneys double talk is a big reason he is not way up in the polls.
I realize the hard core Rep are going to back the nominee simply because he has R beside his name.
The center is where the election is won. Centrist will vote for someone they do not agree with on some policy issues if they feel
the candidate is a person of integrity and would be the best leader for the country.
To be honest No one knows where Romney stands on anything. He will take a position today and change it the same or next day, that makes him look bad.
A good example is his MTP appearance Sunday. His position changed very quickly after his advisors spoke with him.
I am not voting for Obama and have done a tremendous amount of research on Romney.
He scares me. He always changes his stance.
That is not a leadership quality.
It kinda worked for Clinton - he really didn't take a hard stand on anything except needing the BJ all the time.