FLVOL_79
GS-16 Classified
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2011
- Messages
- 47,084
- Likes
- 69,417
Which side of the political fence are you referring to? This law suit by Devin Nunes has every appearance of being the classic "can dish it out but can't take it" response. Nunes has never done anything but either defend or ignore Trump's immature insult-laden Twitter rants. Why can't he just ignore this? A $250 million law suit? Are you kidding me? "Toughen up, butter cup.... they are just words!"How the perperually butthurt forget their past..the irony is rich in this thread. Keep up the good work!
The words hurt my feelings side of course. Ill be honest though id have to google nunes to find out who he is.Which side of the political fence are you referring to? This law suit by Devin Nunes has every appearance of being the classic "can dish it out but can't take it" response. Nunes has never done anything but either defend or ignore Trump's immature insult-laden Twitter rants. Why can't he just ignore this? A $250 million law suit? Are you kidding me? "Toughen up, butter cup.... they are just words!"
It would resolve several problems. I believe people would be nicer. The potential for work/personal consequences would increase, forcing people to think before they speak or out themselves as someone incapable of such forethought and therefore not worth listening to.I agree. When you make it easy for people to use anonymous accounts, you're asking for it.
Holding individuals accountable for their asshattery is not a popular ideology in the e-thug society.It would resolve several problems. I believe people would be nicer. The potential for work/personal consequences would increase, forcing people to think before they speak or out themselves as someone incapable of such forethought and therefore not worth listening to.
If done in a sophisticated way, it lowers the probability of bad faith acts by nation states, political groups, corporations or individuals.
By creating a thin veil of anonymity (click on a tab and see the person’s real name) you could preserve the effect of parody, etc.
It would resolve several problems. I believe people would be nicer. The potential for work/personal consequences would increase, forcing people to think before they speak or out themselves as someone incapable of such forethought and therefore not worth listening to.
If done in a sophisticated way, it lowers the probability of bad faith acts by nation states, political groups, corporations or individuals.
By creating a thin veil of anonymity (click on a tab and see the person’s real name) you could preserve the effect of parody, etc.