To paraphrase Friedman-Each president enters office as in the middle of a chess game. His moves are limited based on the moves of each of his predecessors. If, as some conservatives believe, the majority of Americans are against the Health plan then that showed more courage than the article ascribes. Closing Gitmo would have given BO 'coward' marks from the right. Not doing what it took to try and succeed in Afghanistan would have done the same. BO can't win for losing.
Not trying to defend Obama or anything, but most moves one can make as president will earn the criticism and scrutiny of roughly half the country.
He's been nearly as bad as Bush II, though IMO.
I am not an Obama supporter, but to suggest he is a coward is mind numbingly stupid. Heck, to suggest any POTUS is a coward is mind numbingly stupid. It takes more courage than anyone in this forum has just to run for POTUS, exposing yourself to unprecedented and continuous scrutiny and analysis every single hour of every single day, not to mention the difficult decisions that have to be made on a daily basis.
None of us have a clue
I am not an Obama supporter, but to suggest he is a coward is mind numbingly stupid. Heck, to suggest any POTUS is a coward is mind numbingly stupid. It takes more courage than anyone in this forum has just to run for POTUS, exposing yourself to unprecedented and continuous scrutiny and analysis every single hour of every single day, not to mention the difficult decisions that have to be made on a daily basis.
None of us have a clue
:ermm:no benefits from the office? fame, power, money?