utgibbs
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2009
- Messages
- 7,394
- Likes
- 0
These guys (as should your experience in the real world outside the back door) disagree:
![]()
what? only 1% of "rich" people earned their wealth legally? hard to believe.
working hard and taking a chance to better your station are 2 different things. No one has claimed you'll get rich turning a wrench all day
clearly you're not using your backdoor correctly
Exactly. No reason why you should benefit from a gift or marriage, one of which you have no control over, the other only in half.
But the argument was working hard makes you rich....
It doesn't. As the real world outside the back door clearly demonstrates.
As I said, it is the exception, not the rule.
No it wasn't. The "argument" (which seems to be what your seeking) is that you have the opportunity to work hard and be successful. Your criteria for working hard must be very different from mine. It is not limited to the "blue collar" world that I know well. Unless you buy into the idea that your born is this country with no opportunity.
Bull****
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Bull****
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Capitalism gives us the ability to change our fate if you work hard enough. Posted via VolNation Mobile
I agree with this basic sentiment, but point out some inherent shortfalls in what I think is an oversimplistic view of the matter.
1) even if 70 % of millionaires do not come from millionaire families, you have to admit that coming from certain upbringings gives a person a much better shot at it.
2) The concept of inherited wealth seems fundamentally unfair, but it is of course only natural as human beings that we want to pass on whatever we might have accumulated to our loved ones. Its not going anywhere, though objectively it does deny on its face that capitalism proportionately rewards hard work.
3) I don't know about you, but I don't want to be in a system that ignores human suffering. I am fine with the argument that people who work hard and save should enjoy that. I am not fine with the notion that we ought to move to a voucher system for old people's health, even though we know it to be inadequate, whilst we cut taxes for the wealthiest even more.
4) I don't know about you, but I'd prefer to live in a system that promotes education and maybe even a little bit more education for children coming from impoverished backgrounds, in order to increase the efficiency with which capitalism can reward hard work.
To work hard and be productive, you need the right tools. Sure, some people squander their opportunities and I don't feel sorry for them. But, the said irony is that people from some backgrounds just need better tools and the folks at the top don't seem to want them to have them.
no one denies luck as a component but to say it's all a blessing or luck is crazy. I wouldn't even say luck is as big a factor as timing
Not saying it is all blessing or luck. But simple intelligence and hard work alone doesn't work either. I understand that the market drives what CEOs get paid...but counting the luck (timing, whatever) component into it makes it hard to stomach those guys getting paid 1000x what the desk jockeys do. They are not just smarter and harder working than everyone underneath them.
Not saying it is all blessing or luck. But simple intelligence and hard work alone doesn't work either. I understand that the market drives what CEOs get paid...but counting the luck (timing, whatever) component into it makes it hard to stomach those guys getting paid 1000x what the desk jockeys do. They are not just smarter and harder working than everyone underneath them.
you still have to put yourself in position to advance. Luck is a small part of that. You don't go from desk jockey to CEO because you did well for 6 months
this is at the heart of my bewilderment - why do people concern themselves so much with what other people make? I certainly don't begrudge the higher-ups at my job for their earnings. they make the tough decisions that I don't have to.