VOLatile
BRB Pooping
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Messages
- 14,622
- Likes
- 805
I think it's hard to argue that there isn't media bias against conservatives when network news programs ran segments criticizing Palin's non-mistake re: Paul Revere, while wholly ignoring any of Obama's mistakes..
Either elite media should remain objective (criticize both or criticize neither or simply report the statement without commentary) or admit they're partisan.
Please. She made a huge mistake because she's a moron Truly dumb .
Our final ruling was swayed in the end by this: The president in particular has a responsiblity to get historical facts correct, and in this case he got them completely backwards. Obama mocked Hayes for looking backwards...not looking forwards. In reality, Hayes embraced the new technology. He should be an Obama hero, not a skunk.
Hayes is dead and buried, but he deserves an apology.
When Obama actually gets an historical fact wrong because he just flat has it wrong in his gead, it takes conservative bloggers, who are waiting to pounce, days of research, dozens of footnotes, and several pages to explain his miscue.
Palin and Santorum wear their ignorance as a badge of pride.
When Obama actually gets an historical fact wrong because he just flat has it wrong in his gead, it takes conservative bloggers, who are waiting to pounce, days of research, dozens of footnotes, and several pages to explain his miscue.
Palin and Santorum wear their ignorance as a badge of pride.
When Obama actually gets an historical fact wrong because he just flat has it wrong in his gead, it takes conservative bloggers, who are waiting to pounce, days of research, dozens of footnotes, and several pages to explain his miscue.
Palin and Santorum wear their ignorance as a badge of pride.
Obama makes an incorrect reference to a fairly obscure president and it's the same as Palin's mistake with Paul Revere, a household name?