Obama's Budget

isn't he just buying votes by saying that's what he wants, knowing that there is no way in hell anyone in congress can side with him?

Primarily yes. I'd be interested to know if he really believes it will help the middle class to tax dividends at this rate.
 
PJ Media » Obama’s Farcical Budget Betrays a Crisis-Driven Electoral Strategy

Second, Uncle Sam would have to spend $332 billion a month for the next eight months for full-year outlays to reach the White House’s projected amount. That would require a 10% year-over-year increase for the rest of the year. Though you never would want to completely rule that possibility out with this bunch, the failure of Harry Reid’s Senate to pass a real budget for over 1,000 days accompanied by his clear intention not to attempt one this year means that federal agencies are largely running on autopilot.
-----------------------------

Pegging this year’s estimated outlays at $3.796 trillion makes the administration look as if it will actually be doing something to control spending in fiscal 2013, as that year’s projected total is a nearly identical $3.803 trillion. Horse manure. That amount would really be a ramp-up of 4%-8% over where this year’s outlays will most likely end up ($3.50-$3.65 trillion).

Last year, Investor’s Business Daily characterized the White House’s budget proposal as “gutless.” This year’s is a pathetic farce, partially explained in a cheerleading CNN email alert I received this week: “Obama unveils $3.8 trillion budget that calls for tax hikes on the rich and increased spending on infrastructure and teachers.” Call the people who run the Guinness Book of Records; I think we’ve just discovered the world’s oldest political playbook: “Failed Stimulus and Rich-Bashing.” The Obama lovers at CNN somehow forgot to tell its email’s recipients that the White House’s proposal projects yet another $1.3 trillion deficit (that would mark four years in a row of $1.29 trillion or more), and that it increases spending by over 60% during the next ten years (from the credible midpoint estimate of this year’s spending) to $5.82 trillion (remember those smelling salts I suggested?) while deeply cutting outlays for defense.

It would be one thing if Barack Obama’s charade was occurring in a relatively tranquil economic and financial environment; but that is of course not the case. The federal government is already carrying an almost unfathomable level of debt. Obama’s budget not only betrays the fact that he couldn’t care less about endangering the nation’s long-term fiscal health; it also reveals the frightening likelihood that he and his party plan to ruinously run up the debt even further so it can be used as a political weapon in the fall election campaign.
-------------------------

David Axelrod would probably consider it a perfect storm if a debt crunch inflicts fall mayhem. In combination with other worldwide events, hitting the ceiling before November could even create a pretext for another ginned-up “financial crisis.” These developments have the potential to motivate currently apathetic left-leaning voters and on-the-fence moderates to turn out in droves to ensure that Dear Leader saves them from the scary people who want the government to at least try to live within its means.

obama_penny.jpg


I recomend a pic of Michelle's food nazi ass on the flip side.
 
No chance in hell that he cares. Aside from whacky liberal stuff, he's purely about votes.

More to the point it's about lying to get votes.

Obama is the ultimate shell game con artist.

Cost of Government Center

The spending blueprint mirrors other plans he has put forward during his administration. It keeps spending at unprecedented levels, fails to address the looming entitlement crises and uses budget gimmickry to claim fake savings and unrealistic projections.

The budget continues to call for spending at historic levels: the request sets spending for the fiscal year at $3.8 trillion and projects $47 trillion in spending over the next ten years

Holds spending at 23 percent of the next ten years, two percent higher than its historical average

Uses totally dishonest accounting: the President claims to include $4 trillion in deficit reduction. These supposed cuts include $1.6 trillion in tax hikes and $900 billion in war spending the President plans to plow back into infrastructure spending

Repeats failed “stimulus” spending: For the third year in a row, the plan looks to create a permanent Infrastructure Bank with $350 billion in new spending. The budget also requests $500 billion for a transportation package while shifting Highway Trust Fund spending to mandatory accounts, ensuring its insolvency for posterity

Continues practice of extending Medicare providers payments without offsetting the $438 billion in spending with cuts elsewhere

The budget only addresses 40 percent of the government spending problem: the President bankrupts the entitlement programs by once again refusing to confront the nation’s largest debt-drivers

Fails to take into account the coming costs of the government takeover of healthcare and financial regulatory overhaul. Instead, the President’s budget claims zero effect for supposed cost-saving mechanisms, such as the implementation of the Obamacare Independent Payment Advisory Board

Cements broken promises: breaks his campaign pledge to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term. He already broke his "firm pledge" not to raise any taxes on earners making less than $250,000 many times over
 
This budget is like a 400lb obese person saying I'm going to cut my weight gain to 50 lbs over the next 10 years by switching to diet coke in 3 years.

Will it work? No. Will they survive to see that 10 year mark? Probably not.
 
This budget is like a 400lb obese person saying I'm going to cut my weight gain to 50 lbs over the next 10 years by switching to diet coke in 3 years.

Will it work? No. Will they survive to see that 10 year mark? Probably not.

Interesting way to put it.
 

VN Store



Back
Top