Observation of a praticising physician on obamacare:

#29
#29
Don't you have a Klan meeting to attend?

No, but I would love for you to come to church with me in the morning. There you will learn what loving your fellow man is truly all about. Here is a hint, it is not a hand out.
 
Last edited:
#31
#31
News flash, if you're not insured and unless you're a friggin millionaire and you have cancer or some other disease, you're not getting care.
 
#32
#32
No, but I would love for you to come to church with me in the morning. There you will learn what loving your fellow man is truly all about. Here is a hint, it is not a hand out.
I'll pass... Folks in the Bible Belt (maybe you're southern baptist?) have such a narrow view. I won't live in that bubble where nothing outside of my life matters.
 
#37
#37
I'll pass... Folks in the Bible Belt (maybe you're southern baptist?) have such a narrow view. I won't live in that bubble where nothing outside of my life matters.

I travel the world on mission trips to help people. I sponsor nurses to go to third world countries to help the sick. My church FULLY supports 35 families that do mission/benevolence work here in the US.

Your "broad brush" just has no paint.
 
#41
#41
I guess we have a different definition of care. Lessing someone's pain when they're on their death bed is a form of care. That's not good enough for this country. People have a right to care before a disease reaches terminal status, so they can try to beat it.
 
#43
#43
I guess we have a different definition of care. Lessing someone's pain when they're on their death bed is a form of care. That's not good enough for this country. People have a right to care before a disease reaches terminal status, so they can try to beat it.

No they don't. Also, your version of care revolves around
you deciding what someone has to do. Real caring.
 
#44
#44
I guess we have a different definition of care. Lessing someone's pain when they're on their death bed is a form of care. That's not good enough for this country. People have a right to care before a disease reaches terminal status, so they can try to beat it.

You truly are clueless aren't you. I was beginning to hope that you were just throwing this stuff out there to stir the pot. Another mind waisted.
 
#45
#45
No they don't. Also, your version of care revolves around
you deciding what someone has to do. Real caring.
Man, if charities could help out every person who needed care in this country, I'd tell the government to go away. However, charities can't do that since there's too many people like MG who couldn't give a rat's ass about other people.
Accordingly, the government has to "decide" in some cases what people can/can not do. Again, slavery people had to be TOLD by the government to stop it since they were too stupid to figure it out for themselves. The same for voting, etc.......... To me, this is no different. People dying when healthcare is out there but they can't afford it (for whatever reason) is unacceptable in this country.
 
#46
#46
like advanced care for terminal patients is ever going to happen under gov't healthcare
 

VN Store



Back
Top