Pretty snarky post, IMO. Even with Lane getting suspended and coming back, he still split first team reps with Neal. That pretty much tells me he's better than Neal in the coach's eyes. If Neal was even equal to Lane, he would have taken the starting job months ago.
Picture this: (even for one play a game or so) We come out with one of the more mobile QBs (or Pig, I guess) in a 2-RB shotgun formation. Lane on one side, Neal on the other. Run a triple option that begins as an inside zone read to Lane so the options are give to Lane running downhill into the line or the QB keeps to the other side and options out with Neal. Could have potential.
The article states that there is no number 1 between Lane and Neal. That makes me extremely happy. Last year, I thought it was clear that Lane was better. At the open practice, I thought Neal was finally running like he was supposed to... If they're that close to each other this year, I can only assume great things.
Pretty snarky post, IMO. Even with Lane getting suspended and coming back, he still split first team reps with Neal. That pretty much tells me he's better than Neal in the coach's eyes. If Neal was even equal to Lane, he would have taken the starting job months ago.
Uh no. It means they will split reps no matter what. Lane has had plenty of chances to excel and he hasn't. His ypc are inflated. For the record I don't care who the hell runs the ball as long as they do well. But this notion that Lane is far superior is ridiculous. Backups are always the favorite players...until they actually play.
Stupid post is stupid. Backups are favorites until they play?? Lane has played, and has outperformed Neal. He had better stats last year, and he has big play ability, which is something Neal lacks. Neal is a freak athlete, but freak athletes aren't always great position players.
Lane's numbers are inflated?? He played against two of the top defenses in the SEC last year (Alabama and South Carolina) and still averaged over 3ypc against them.
And for the record, I don't think Lane is far superior. But I do think he's superior, for sure.
Also, Neal has had more chances to excel than Lane. He is a year older and has started more games. Neal has had plenty of chances, and hasn't really shown much.
I really like how there hasn't appeared to have been many "bad" practices. Just a couple areas thru out the course of practice. Or maybe the Dools was just extremely negative cuz it seemed like they would have a good practice then a bad one, about 50/50. Not like that now I'm excited (and hope) these guys have improved. Well duh of course that have; it's a new coach.
Bot
As a reply to you both, the running game will be fine BUT will suffer tremedously if teams stack the box because they can't throw worth a poo. If the passing game can keep from being abismal, they have a chance to be in the top half in conference in rushing.