Offensive balance

[tone357]

8 and 8 to 5. So it’s still higher towards RWR and slot. The only difference is Bru actually played in the full game this time

8 to 5 isn’t almost equal. Rather it’s a 60% increase

I will take that as a tacit admission that I'm right!

 

[Vol8188]

I will take that as a tacit admission that I'm right!

If your claim is “we throw to Bru more when he’s actually in the game, but still less than we do Tillman or Hyatt”

Than yes, I agree. But that’s not your claim. You’re trying to pretend that throwing less to him in a game he barely played in, is proof that we don’t evenly distribute the ball when Tillman is in.

 

[Vol8188]

I will take that as a tacit admission that I'm right!

It was also 8 to 4 until the very last play of the game. So we threw the ball to the RWR and Slot both twice as many times as we did Bru until the final play.

This isn’t helping your case

 

[tim]

Keyton deserves some respeck! That young man has saved our hide this year

 

[tone357]

It was also 8 to 4 until the very last play of the game. So we threw the ball to the RWR and Slot both twice as many times as we did Bru until the final play.

This isn’t helping your case

You don't know when to quit digging! You've just described passing game imbalance perfectly!

 

[LittleVol]

We're specifically discussing balance in the passing game as it relates to Tillman being on the field. Look at the balance in the Alabama game where he did not play.

Yeah.
And everyone can sense that too.

Not Cedric's fault tho...
That was HH

 

[Vol8188]

We're specifically discussing balance in the passing game as it relates to Tillman being on the field. Look at the balance in the Alabama game where he did not play.

Obviously, you didn't look at the number of targets! It's almost equally distributed!

You don't know when to quit digging! You've just described passing game imbalance perfectly!

So the game you said was "almost equally distributed" was actually an example of "passing game imbalance"?

I can't tell if you're trolling at this point or dim. This was your stated example of "balance". Now it's proof of imbalance?

 

[tone357]

So the game you said was "almost equally distributed" was actually an example of "passing game imbalance"?

I can't tell if you're trolling at this point or dim. This was your stated example of "balance". Now it's proof of imbalance?

Maybe you should check your reading comprehension before trying to throw shade. I described your statement that read, "So we threw the ball to the RWR AND SLOT BOTH TWICE AS MANY TIMES as we did Bru until the final play"as the example.

 

[Vol8188]

Maybe you should check your reading comprehension before trying to throw shade. I described your statement that read, "So we threw the ball to the RWR AND SLOT BOTH TWICE AS MANY TIMES as we did Bru until the final play"as the example.

Yes. You tried to pretend that game (the one we are both agreeing was unbalanced) was a sign of passing game balance because Tillman was out.

That's your entire claim. If Tillman is in=unbalanced. Tillman out=balanced.

Yet you've admitted your example of balance without Tillman (the Bama game) was actually 2-1 in favor of the RWR over LRW and 2-1 in favor of the slot of the LRW until the final play of the game that was thrown to Bru (LRW).

Therefore your hypothesis fails.

 

[tone357]

Yes. You tried to pretend that game (the one we are both agreeing was unbalanced) was a sign of passing game balance because Tillman was out.

That's your entire claim. If Tillman is in=unbalanced. Tillman out=balanced.

Yet you've admitted your example of balance without Tillman (the Bama game) was actually 2-1 in favor of the RWR over LRW and 2-1 in favor of the slot of the LRW until the final play of the game that was throw to Bru (LRW).
Therefore your hypothesis fails.

Wait what? You finally agreed on something I said? I didn't see that! LOL! OK man, Imma let you have it. You've worn me out!

 

[Vol8188]

Wait what? You finally agreed on something I said? I didn't see that! LOL! OK man, Imma let you have it. You've worn me out!

So we agree in the Bama game there was not balance. Yet your entire hypothesis is that we had balance when Tillman was out?

Great work. Maybe you can fail more tomorrow.

 

[tone357]

So we agree in the Bama game there was not balance. Yet your entire hypothesis is that we had balance when Tillman was out?

Great work. Maybe you can fail more tomorrow.

LOL! You're a riot, dude! No, we don't agree! The stats show balance across the recieving core! But if you want to ignore them, have at it. You're probably never wrong. (in your own mind) I'm sure you've heard that a time or two in your life.

 

[Vol8188]

LOL! You're a riot, dude! No, we don't agree! The stats show balance across the recieving core! But if you want to ignore them, have at it. You're probably never wrong. (in your own mind) I'm sure you've heard that a time or two in your life.

8-8-5 is not balance. Nor does one sample prove a concept. You're overstating your hand.

 

[JoAllan]

We're specifically discussing balance in the passing game as it relates to Tillman being on the field. Look at the balance in the Alabama game where he did not play.

I understand but when you got multiple viable targets how is it balanced or unbalanced vs what others do?

 

[tone357]

I understand but when you got multiple viable targets how is it balanced or unbalanced vs what others do?

The discussion is about the perception that some have that says the offense is better when Tillman is out. I just wanted to see if the stats support that.

 

[JoAllan]

The discussion is about the perception that some have that says the offense is better when Tillman is out. I just wanted to see if the stats support that.

Balance between him and others doesn’t matter to support that. Either the O is better when he’s in or it isn’t.

There could be tons of variables…….can’t simply look at that.

If he’s been in and not 100 (which we don’t know)??

Teams played with him and without?

Defenses played?

Other players out for both teams?

Field and field conditions?

Weather?

Running game success?

All kinds of variables.