Official Global Warming thread (merged)

#6,854
#6,854
There is more evidence that CC is a natural occuring event than one caused by Human Pollution.
 
#6,855
#6,855
U.S. scientists officially declare 2016 the hottest year on record. That makes three in a row.
C2duo3BXcAIMycn.jpg

2016 was a record in all surface data sets. It was also a record in the (skeptics' preferred) satellite data sets. Furthermore, global sea ice closed out 2016 at a record low level.

As Mooney's article states, it's also noteworthy that the stratosphere set a record cold temperature in 2016. The cooling stratosphere was predicted by climate scientists decades ago and is one of several clear fingerprints which indicate climate change is caused by human greenhouse gas emissions.

:zeitung_lesen:

Prepare for reanimation of the zombie myth ‘no global warming since 2016’
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#6,857
#6,857
The problem is that nobody knows why it's happening. The man made theory is being perpetuated because it's politically convient. People who think it's a planetary cycle won't get any funding to examine it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#6,863
#6,863
For the record, this thread is over 6 years old now. None of the US has sunk into the ocean and polar bears are not extinct. I'll be sure to post this comment again in another 6 years when everything is EXACTLY the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#6,864
#6,864
Apparently we need more abortions to fight global warming
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iil1Z8-A1GA[/youtube]
 
#6,867
#6,867
golfballs said:
World leaders duped by manipulated global warming data | Daily Mail Online
Click to expand...
:thud:
Screen-Shot-2017-02-04-at-11.44.06-PM.png

Hausfather also points out a glaring error in the Mail on Sunday article that illustrates its author’s lack of knowledge. The article includes a graph of both the NOAA and UK Met Office records. The NOAA data appears to be roughly 0.1°C warmer than the UK Met Office data across the entire time span—supposedly evidence of “flawed NOAA data showing higher temperatures.” Apart from the fact that a constant offset would have no impact on temperature trends, the offset is simply a mistake. The numbers in the two datasets are calculated relative to different baselines—the 1901-2000 average for NOAA, and the 1961-1990 average for the Met Office. Once you put them on a common baseline, the differences largely disappear.

The Mail on Sunday updated the caption to note that the datasets “are offset in temperature by 0.12°C due to different analysis techniques,” but the graph remains unchanged. And it's not clear how many Mail readers will understand the importance of this offset.
Click to expand...

Screen-Shot-2017-02-05-at-5.47.57-PM.png


Hausfather noted that NOAA’s updated dataset doesn't cause it to show more warming than the datasets run by NASA, the Berkeley team, and the UK Met Office. Instead, the update caused NOAA to stop showing less warming than everyone else.
Click to expand...

Oh noes what a conspiracy! All the world leaders have been duped by NOAA! Thank God Lamar Smith and House Science Committee are hard at work tweeting the real truth.

-sigh-
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#6,869
#6,869
theFallGuy said:
where is Bart when we need him?
Click to expand...
hog88 said:
Measuring snowflakes.
Click to expand...
Funny, we actually got a decent snowstorm this week. I had to take a snow day. Must be global cooling!

I lurk. I’ve been pretty busy and haven’t seen much worth posting about lately. VN is plumb crazy right now. Once Trump actually does something on climate change I might be around more but for now I’m in wait and see mode.

Speakin of, y'all should go see the carbon dividends thread
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top