Official Global Warming thread (merged)

I hope this question creates a civil discussion because I am genuinely curious:

What is the fundamental difference in spending billions on NASA and spending billions on climate change?

I personally don’t support giving NASA billions of dollars. But one big difference is appropriating money to climate change is ridiculous. So is it safe to assume the you support electric vehicles? That will put an even bigger strain on the power grid than gas powered vehicles. We cannot change the sun, which is the biggest determination of the climate.

We shouldn’t be spending billions on NASA or climate change.
 
Our climate will change regardless of what we do. It’s done it many times over the millennia. Investment in space exploration may lead to an alternative to this rock for humanity.
Yes but there are ways to mitigate the issue as long as possible. They are prohibitively expensive, but so is what will be necessary to leave this solar system.
 
Yes but there are ways to mitigate the issue as long as possible. They are prohibitively expensive, but so is what will be necessary to leave this solar system.

Any money spent on “climate change” should be spent on how we live and thrive in a warming climate and not how to slow or stop it. So far our response to climate change has been nothing more than a mechanism to enact more controls on the citizenry and line to pockets of the elite.
 
Yes but there are ways to mitigate the issue as long as possible. They are prohibitively expensive, but so is what will be necessary to leave this solar system.

We are spending billions of dollars to just be apart of some global, pseudo science club that can’t stop what the earth has always done , change its climate .. when we have these clear and present dangers to our oceans that is without a doubt man made , and 100% our doing . Where’s the global outrage and PR for this , something that all countries could put that money toward and see immediate results from ?

Great Pacific garbage patch - Wikipedia
 
You should read those two things again. He didn’t mention if it were “caused by man” but rather the “apocalyptic story”. Which is pseudoscience garbage


I’d donate good money to the climate scam, I mean climate change cause , just to watch EL forced to debate Jordan P on any topic . 😂
 
I’d donate good money to the climate scam, I mean climate change cause , just to watch EL forced to debate Jordan P on any topic . 😂
That would be the mental equivalent of the Battle of Omdurman with EL playing the role of the Mahdi; pure unadulterated slaughter.

Edit: Jordan Peterson would be identifying as British Maxim machine guns.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 0nelilreb
You should read those two things again. He didn’t mention if it were “caused by man” but rather the “apocalyptic story”. Which is pseudoscience garbage


EL is the climate alarmist foot soldier. Please let government identify a "problem" and then take away more of our freedoms while the global class continues to accumulate wealth. IDGAF what Greta the petulant child says I am not driving a f...in. electric car
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wireless1 and hog88
My dad recently explained to me the root cause of global warming.

He said that in the 70s and 80s the world was threatened by a new ice age and acid rain. They kicked so much ass on that the climate swing back the other way and brought us our current global warming problems.

This made more sense than anything I’ve ever heard.
Cool story bro
 

VN Store



Back
Top