Fact is, OV, boro, and jay (as well as a few others from other sites), all have very similar information as I do. We get it from a variety of places and the facts are, that they all are congruent with each other.
I'm not looking for ecred and could care less. All I'm doing is passing on the same information that I have received. Others are doing the same.
Will Gruden be our next head coach? No one is 100% sure until he steps up on a podium with Dave Hart. However, I know for a fact that UT is going all in for him. He has shown quite a bit of interest back. The details are in the middle and hopefully it will all pan out.
Well that's what I was asking smart ass.
As for validity, they are well worth listening to. Are they claiming anything is 100%? No. If you don't think something is going on you are entitled to your opinion. If you do, you have to use your judgement on who you believe or have more faith in. This thread hasn't gone almost 18,000 including the original for nothing. And if you want concrete evidence or some kind of recording from Haslam, you are dreaming to think you will get it. Actually, I think they are even more believable since they don't give up their sources. So read more and back the **** off OV.
The people providing info here don't have to prove anything to anyone. They have repeatedly said that it is not a done deal, and they are not looking for e-cred. Info has come from a multitude of people and not just from here. It has also begun to leak to the media. This is why I choose to believe the Gruden rumors are true. We're all just going to have to wait to see what happens.
More unprovoked insults. Nice.
OV is the one claiming to have proof.
For the 100th time, I'm not the one asking for people to give up sources. Your buddies started that nonsense on response to the babyavi character. Why does everyone keep skating over this point?
And thanks for telling me I'm entitled to my own opinion. I was beginning to wonder if that was allowed
Maybe I'm way off, but I took the comments about them texting Gruden and his reply that he heard them discussing golf to both be jokes, or in the case of the Gruden texting, humorous wishful thinking.
I obviously fat fingered vouch. You obviously knew what I meant but felt like taking a shot at me anyway.
So just because I'm asking the same questions as our insiders are asking others I'm considered forum police. Doesn't seem fair, but okay.
You claim these posters are reputable. If you would kindly point me to a few things they've had inside info on on the past, that would help set me straight since I'm fairly new here.
Media are wrong all the time and yet none of them are reporting the "facts" that we have here. I'm not disputing some of the info here will turn out to be accurate, I just don't believe it's as cut and dry as some are trying to make out. Is that not allowed?
More unprovoked insults. Nice.
OV is the one claiming to have proof.
For the 100th time, I'm not the one asking for people to give up sources. Your buddies started that nonsense on response to the babyavi character. Why does everyone keep skating over this point?
And thanks for telling me I'm entitled to my own opinion. I was beginning to wonder if that was allowed
Yes. There were a few in Arkansas I believe. Nothing in Memphis though.
Fonz, as you seem to have found what ever that was you linked to, you have continually stated that there is a double standard. But shouldn't a double standard include information from you in order for it to be a double standard?
Why haven't you ever posted your information? All you claim is double standard. Lay your information on the table and lets just see if it is. All your going by is what went on with Babyavi and nothing more.
Please put your info on the table as to what YOU know.
Mine is laid out in two separate threads.