Official Jon Gruden Thread II (merged)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Top 25 and SEC are the same thing :rolleyes:

Pretty much. But if Dan Mullen can wins 9 games in his second season and be 7-0 in his fourth season, wtf is Dooley's problem? Not being able to count past 10??

Miss State > Tennessee

That's sayin something.
 
Wow. When was this taken?...total different level of body language happening there...you have Dools, sharp eyed and confident, with a slight smile in his convo. You have Manning, with no aggressive hands on hips posturing and patting ole boy on the arm...

Yeah, Im weird, but I watch these things...its a game I have come to cultivate...

Last year, I can't remember which game but Peyton got in the booth and went on and on how good Wilcox was.
 
Pretty much. But if Dan Mullen can wins 9 games in his second season and be 7-0 in his fourth season, wtf is Dooley's problem? Not being able to count past 10??

Miss State > Tennessee

That's sayin something.

To be fair, though, if we played MSU's schedule, we'd be 7-0, too. If we got them at home, we probably would've beaten them.
 
Yes, or we could beat USC. There's no telling where this team truly stands. We lose to good teams, and we beat bad teams.

Ironically, your last sentence explains exactly where this team stands. It would be more accurate, though, so far, to say we always lose to good teams and usually beat bad teams.
 
Your opinion of my 7-5 info precedes you

I must have disagreed with you previously then, just as I do now. I didn't get the memo that's not allowed. My apologies. I honestly wish I remembered our previous interaction, because it would have saved me the trouble of a second. It apparently made a much bigger impression on you than it did me.
 
To be fair, though, if we played MSU's schedule, we'd be 7-0, too. If we got them at home, we probably would've beaten them.

Hypothetical.

Dooley's team celebrated a win over UAB in OT. Needed OT to beat Vandy and lost to Kentucky.

There are no hypothetical when it comes to his record in the SEC and against ranked opponents. He wasn't even good in the WAC. If LaTech didn't have to travel across the country, maybe they would have beaten Idaho. It is what it is... he's not a good coach.
 
Kind of explains the team performance during Dooley's tenure. The coach is a quitter, so why should the team be any different?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top