Look, I want Gruden as much as everyone else on here does, but so many posts here sound like bad country songs.
"I don't even know if I could root for Tennessee if we got Gary Patterson."
Shut up, guy!
I want us to get the best coach possible, but I'll keep rooting for UT and watching UT games even if we hire Ron Akey!
But the big thing I want to hammer home is that most of the great coaching hires of the past two decades did not seem like "home runs" at the time. Many of the best hires were "up and comers" that the fanbases were not completely sold on. And since there's a reasonable chance that we'll get an up and comer, it's important to remember that.
How about some of the greatest hires of the past few decades:
Pete Carroll. Was USC's 4th or 5th choice. The fanbase was irate after he was hired. He was viewed as an unsuccessful NFL coach who would never succeed in college. Uh, so much for that.
Bob Stoops. Never had any head coaching experience before taking the job at Oklahoma. Won a national title in Year 2.
Nick Saban at LSU. On paper, he was an average to slightly-above-average coach at Michigan State. In reality, he was fighting an uphill battle at MSU, and made LSU into a national title contender very quickly.
Chip Kelly. Does anyone remember how the Oregon fanbase and the sports media was ready to fire this guy after his first game against Boise State? That was the game that included LaGarrett Blount punching a guy on Boise State after the game. Remember Chip Kelly had only been in I-A football for two years prior to that as an OC. He was never a head coach anywhere else, so people thought he was in over his head.
Will Muschamp. Was considered to be "on the hot seat" after Year 1. Many felt he was a poor hire.
Jim Mora, Jr. This is probably the most insane one of all. I remember UCLA hiring Jim Mora, Jr., a very good NFL coach last year, and most of the UCLA fanbase being upset at the pick and the sports media generally panned it. I'm not sure what planet these people lived on, but everything about it screamed out "HOME RUN HIRE!" and yet it was treated like a strike-out. One year later, and it's already looking like a great hire.
Some of the perceived "home runs" have turned out to be duds, as well. How about Rich Rod at Michigan? Or Dennis Franchione at Texas A&M?
All I'm saying is that if the Vols don't get Gruden and end up hiring an up-and-comer like Charlie Strong or Dan Mullen, there's no reason to go crying in your bedroom. It's always difficult to tell how good someone might be when put in a different situation. Some of these guys at lesser programs are battling with much lesser resources. At a place like UT, they might be able to create something special.
I'm rooting for Gruden, but I'll still be happy and supportive if we get a Charlie Strong or Dan Mullen, or even an unknown like Dave Doeren at N. Illinois.