Official Watch Party Thread (NCAAT seeding edition)

#380
#380
LSU loses?
tvguide-crying.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Volprofch05, chuckiepoo, Lankykong and 1 other person
#382
#382
bleedingTNorange said:
Booo…
Virginia loses
Xavier loses
TCU loses
Tulane loses
Ole Miss loses
LSU loses
Minnesota loses
Click to expand...

We’ve had some real **** luck this year. Very little movement on the seed lines above us. It’s pretty much all the top teams just keep winning and those bubble teams are unable to find any traction and get a few big wins.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo
#383
#383
TheMookieMonster said:
We’ve had some real **** luck this year. Very little movement on the seed lines above us. It’s pretty much all the top teams just keep winning and those bubble teams are unable to find any traction and get a few big wins.
Click to expand...
Definitely seems increasingly likely a 3 is our ceiling unless a few teams go cold, and quick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo
#384
#384
bleedingTNorange said:
Definitely seems increasingly likely a 3 is our ceiling unless a few teams go cold, and quick.
Click to expand...

You’d think based on the extremely little movement that it will be a boring tournament this year and just be a lot of chalk. But, something tells me the lack of big upsets and the weak bubble means we’re in store for a crazy tournament lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chuckiepoo and TrumpedUpVol
#386
#386
Strong closes from Vanderbilt (79), Colorado (81) and South Carolina (87) would be huge…all 3 are currently Q2 away game wins and Vandy & SC both are Q3 home wins…if those teams can get to Top 75 it would add 3 Q1 wins to our resume and 2 Q2 wins to our resume, would really give our resume a boost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Orange#1, Willy14, Ryno14 and 3 others
#394
#394
Listening to a podcast, and they just mentioned how the committee sees conference record as irrelevant. Has this always been the case?
 
#395
#395
Dallasbowlin said:
Listening to a podcast, and they just mentioned how the committee sees conference record as irrelevant. Has this always been the case?
Click to expand...
Pretty much, it’s whole body of work…plus all conference schedules aren’t equal, not sure how the SEC SOS in conference stacks up but I would venture to guess ours is up there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dallasbowlin
#396
#396
Dallasbowlin said:
Listening to a podcast, and they just mentioned how the committee sees conference record as irrelevant. Has this always been the case?
Click to expand...
It is probably relative. I think it is irrelevant unless it's poor. For example, if an SEC team finishes 19-12 and on the bubble, but they have a 7-11 conference record, it's going to be viewed as a negative, especially if the non-conference record is a house of cards built on wins over poor competition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Big Orange#1, Lankykong, chuckiepoo and 2 others
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top