One Thing Is Painfully Obvious About This Team...

#51
#51
If you can't tell we are a better coached offensive team already, then I don't know what to tell you.

I don't want you to tell me anything considering your insightful analysis of Tennessee's offense against a small, lower-tier Southern Conference team.

I think I'll give it a few more games (maybe even a season or two) before I give the edge of coaching to Martin over Pearl. And yes, before you point it out, I know that Pearl is no longer our coach. I also know, before you point it out, that Pearl left under less than glorious circumstances. But considering Pearl coached Tennessee into its best winning percentages and tournament victories than any other UT coach, I'm going to wait to give a snap judgement as you did.
 
#52
#52
Oh, look. A University of Pearl supporter. Jesus Christ. Let it go, and knock off the constant attacks if anyone praises Coach Martin and says they think he's doing a good job.

Please point out the attack I made on Cuonzo Martin. I didn't say he wasn't doing a good job either. With the way our football program is sinking into its black hole, there is nothing more than I want than to have Martin win games and get us to the tournament. My point is that I don't know if he will.

If Martin takes this rag-tag group of players to the tourney, than I will be more than happy and consider him to be a good hire, maybe even a great hire.
 
#53
#53
great...someone went and got him riled up, prepare to be labeled a pearl supporter if you show even the slightest sign of Nonobjectivity

I'm completely over Pearl. This crap where some of our posters attack others if anyone dare praise Cuonzo or says the team looks better than last year is just ridiculous. Get over Bruce Pearl.
 
#54
#54
Please point out the attack I made on Cuonzo Martin. I didn't say he wasn't doing a good job either. With the way our football program is sinking into its black hole, there is nothing more than I want than to have Martin win games and get us to the tournament. My point is that I don't know if he will.

If Martin takes this rag-tag group of players to the tourney, than I will be more than happy and consider him to be a good hire, maybe even a great hire.

You mean you are using logic and reason to make your assesment? ...unfathomable

I will just label you a pearlophile and call it a day


(honestly though your assesment that we will get pounded in the SEC is a bit overstated, I mean it would be fair if the SEC was good, but it clearly is not)
 
#55
#55
Lawvol, it is natural to compare a current coach to previous coach. There isn't any reason to rant and rave every time someone mentions Pearl. I think you need to get over Getting Over Pearl.
 
#56
#56
I don't want you to tell me anything considering your insightful analysis of Tennessee's offense against a small, lower-tier Southern Conference team.

I think I'll give it a few more games (maybe even a season or two) before I give the edge of coaching to Martin over Pearl. And yes, before you point it out, I know that Pearl is no longer our coach. I also know, before you point it out, that Pearl left under less than glorious circumstances. But considering Pearl coached Tennessee into its best winning percentages and tournament victories than any other UT coach, I'm going to wait to give a snap judgement as you did.

This isn't about Pearl.

You just watched the opponent. You didn't watch the team. They rotated the ball better, and showed an overall aggressiveness to the basket that resulted in a lot of good looks that didn't happen last year. They also had three backdoor cut baskets, which is more than probably the whole team last year. They do better setting screens and made UNCG go back to man after being in zone and watching three's rain down. That's what I'm talking about.
 
#57
#57
Please point out the attack I made on Cuonzo Martin. I didn't say he wasn't doing a good job either. With the way our football program is sinking into its black hole, there is nothing more than I want than to have Martin win games and get us to the tournament. My point is that I don't know if he will.

If Martin takes this rag-tag group of players to the tourney, than I will be more than happy and consider him to be a good hire, maybe even a great hire.

No, I didn't say you attacked Martin. I said you attacked a poster who dare compliment him.
 
#58
#58
I'm completely over Pearl. This crap where some of our posters attack others if anyone dare praise Cuonzo or says the team looks better than last year is just ridiculous. Get over Bruce Pearl.

But you are the one who brought him up...

You just made a blanket assumption that his post was somehow related to pearl, thats all I was saying
 
#60
#60
But you are the one who brought him up...

You just made a blanket assumption that his post was somehow related to pearl, thats all I was saying

Well, let's see. The post he attacked was a post that said we looked better coached than last year. He then reminded us how we're going to get annihilated during the SEC schedule and maybe our fans deserve for saying "we looked better coached" than we did last year when Bruce Pearl was our coach. It doesn't take a genius, hulkhands.
 
#61
#61
:good!:
You mean you are using logic and reason to make your assesment? ...unfathomable

I will just label you a pearlophile and call it a day


(honestly though your assesment that we will get pounded in the SEC is a bit overstated, I mean it would be fair if the SEC was good, but it clearly is not)

You're right, the SEC hasn't been very good outside of KY, FL, TN(in the past few years), Vandy and the occasional SEC west upstart. But Tennessee has to play each of those teams twice, you have to admit it would be an upset to beat any one of those teams once this year. The team is just not big enough and they can't expect to shoot from 3 the way they did last night for the rest of the season.
 
#62
#62
Well, let's see. The post he attacked was a post that said we looked better coached than last year. He then reminded us how we're going to get annihilated during the SEC schedule and maybe our fans deserve for saying "we looked better coached" than we did last year when Bruce Pearl was our coach. It doesn't take a genius, hulkhands.

no, but it has a tendency of derailing the thread when the name pearl is brought up instead of arguing his points such as saying

but the sec isn't any good Larkin..
Or
You say we haven't seen enough to know we are good, but we haven't seen enough to know we are not Larkin
 
#63
#63
no, but it has a tendency of derailing the thread when the name pearl is brought up instead of arguing his points such as saying

He deserved calling out. You don't make stupid statements like "we deserve getting our asses kicked" because someone said that we looked better coached than we did with the guy who got himself fired and got a 3 year show cause. I'm not the one who decided to start this up, so get over it with your stupid defense of his post. There is no defense to saying something that stupid.
 
#64
#64
Well, let's see. The post he attacked was a post that said we looked better coached than last year. He then reminded us how we're going to get annihilated during the SEC schedule and maybe our fans deserve for saying "we looked better coached" than we did last year when Bruce Pearl was our coach. It doesn't take a genius, hulkhands.

An attack would be something like this:

"Dude, you are an idiot for claiming that this team is better coached than those teams under the most successful coach in Tennessee's basketball history. I can't imagine that someone would have such baseless intellect as to make that statement and is obviously incapable of making worthwile comparisons. I'm sorry that the world has to put up with posters like you and hope your post count reduces over this basketball season"

If you are that thin skinned to think my first post was an attack, then I am sorry for you.
 
#65
#65
He deserved calling out. You don't make stupid statements like "we deserve getting our asses kicked" because someone said that we looked better coached than we did with the guy who got himself fired and got a 3 year show cause. I'm not the one who decided to start this up, so get over it with your stupid defense of his post. There is no defense to saying something that stupid.

you are being hypocritical by saying you are done with pearl, but intentionally inject him into the conversation when it could have been easily avoided. Let it go
 
#66
#66
you are being hypocritical by saying you are done with pearl, but intentionally inject him into the conversation when it could have been easily avoided. Let it go

That is completely stupid. The topic of Pearl was brought up by Larkin although he didn't explicitly come out and say "I love Bruce and no one should praise Cuonzo." If you can't figure that out, then you're not smart enough to be arguing on here.
 
#67
#67
I'm calling you out Lawvol for wanting to put a moratorium on the name Pearl.
 
#70
#70
Nevermind Lawvol, I give up, you win. Cuonzo Martin is the GREATEST coach on the planet. Coach K better watch out, this group of incredibly coached UT BB players are going to rock your world with slicing backdoor cuts and an improved Orlando Woolridge hairdo.
 
#71
#71
That is completely stupid. The topic of Pearl was brought up by Larkin although he didn't explicitly come out and say "I love Bruce and no one should praise Cuonzo." If you can't figure that out, then you're not smart enough to be arguing on here.

"The Topic" of pearl was brought up by you, I mean the posts are time stamped and ordered. You assummed that his statement was somehow a backdoor endorsement of Bruce Pearl as if you can't be a critic of Martin without being a supporter of Pearl.
 
#72
#72
It is the spiral of all UT related threads. Criticize Dooley or Martin and watch out!
 
#73
#73
"The Topic" of pearl was brought up by you, I mean the posts are time stamped and ordered. You assummed that his statement was somehow a backdoor endorsement of Bruce Pearl as if you can't be a critic of Martin without being a supporter of Pearl.

I'm done with this. If you honestly believe that I injected Bruce Pearl into the discussion, you're not capable of rational discussion anyway. Why don't you ask Larkin since essentially admits to doing so? If you all want a haven to kiss Pearl's ass continuously, I'd suggest you create a Bruce Pearl Fan Club Thread, and post in it all the time. I'll never go in it, and you all can have fun with it. I'd just rather discuss things related to Tennessee basketball in this forum.
 
#75
#75
It is the spiral of all UT related threads. Criticize Dooley or Martin and watch out!

Your post wasn't criticism, it was a childish prediction brought out of thin air. Do you honestly think it's rational to say that the team is deserving of SEC losses because fans are excited and optimistic during a time of unknown change?
 

VN Store



Back
Top