Operation Crossfire Hurricane: The FBI’s secret cabal against Trump

DWfj_wUVAAAP3JA.jpg




This will go down as one of the worst crimes in US political history, wait and see!

These people make Nixon's plumbers look like the rank amateurs that they were, and this group is made up of lifetime members of the justice branch and the "top shelf" law enforcement. There's simply too much experience and legal background for their actions to be interpreted as a mistake or error in judgement. What they did was illegal, they were well aware, and they did it anyway ... no excuses.
 
The GOP is not full of nice guys. It's as full of bought and paid for criminals as the DNC is.

There is one huge difference, though. The media will cover or minimize Dim corruption, and they will gleefully expose GOP corruption. One side can get away with what the other can't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1972 Grad
These people make Nixon's plumbers look like the rank amateurs that they were, and this group is made up of lifetime members of the justice branch and the "top shelf" law enforcement. There's simply too much experience and legal background for their actions to be interpreted as a mistake or error in judgement. What they did was illegal, they were well aware, and they did it anyway ... no excuses.
This group among others should be locked up but nothing will happen to any of them
 
Something new to me... petty for sure.

MSNBC fact-checks Graham live during Barr hearing
 
Something new to me... petty for sure.

MSNBC fact-checks Graham live during Barr hearing

Petty?

Just so we're clear, you believe that the MEDIA 'fact checking' a POLITICIAN is "petty?"

Holy sht.
 
It’s petty when they ONLY fact checked one side during a live hearing.

Maybe only one "side" required it? Or perhaps you could look to your favorite media outlet to eschew their opinion "journalism" for a couple of minutes and deal with reality and truth themselves?

Irrespective of side, fact-checking politicians, irrespective of partisan lean should be applauded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
Maybe only one "side" required it? Or perhaps you could look to your favorite media outlet to eschew their opinion "journalism" for a couple of minutes and deal with reality and truth themselves?

Irrespective of side, fact-checking politicians, irrespective of partisan lean should be applauded.

I don't have a favorite media outlet and I have criticized all MSM outlets for their biased reporting. It's petty when any of them pull that crap, they are no longer journalist.

And LMAO at "only side required it". GTFOH with that asinine idea.
 
Maybe only one "side" required it? Or perhaps you could look to your favorite media outlet to eschew their opinion "journalism" for a couple of minutes and deal with reality and truth themselves?

Irrespective of side, fact-checking politicians, irrespective of partisan lean should be applauded.
Fact check one side, cheer-lead for the other-MSNBC
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and ajvol01
I don't have a favorite media outlet and I have criticized all MSM outlets for their biased reporting. It's petty when any of them pull that crap, they are no longer journalist.

And LMAO at "only side required it". GTFOH with that asinine idea.

There's nothing preventing any outlet from fact-checking any politician. That you don't like the target of the 'fact-checking' is meaningless.

Holding politicians accountable, irrespective of partisan lean should be applauded. There's no rule stating that only the liberal media is allowed to do it, facts aren't partisan.
 
There's nothing preventing any outlet from fact-checking any politician. That you don't like the target of the 'fact-checking' is meaningless.

Holding politicians accountable, irrespective of partisan lean should be applauded. There's no rule stating that only the liberal media is allowed to do it, facts aren't partisan.

I criticized them for fact checking only one side, not because of the target.

If you're going to troll at least try to keep the stories straight.
 
Maybe only one "side" required it? Or perhaps you could look to your favorite media outlet to eschew their opinion "journalism" for a couple of minutes and deal with reality and truth themselves?

Irrespective of side, fact-checking politicians, irrespective of partisan lean should be applauded.
LMFAO!
 
I criticized them for fact checking only one side, not because of the target.

If you're going to troll at least try to keep the stories straight.

Your partisan goggle straps need to be loosened up.
 
The GOP is not full of nice guys. It's as full of bought and paid for criminals as the DNC is.


This is very true, bought and paid for actors on both sides of the isle.
Politics in this nation is as corrupt as any nation in the world, unfortunately.
 
This is very true, bought and paid for actors on both sides of the isle.
Politics in this nation is as corrupt as any nation in the world, unfortunately.

Liberals pose the greatest threat to our republic and will destroy this country if left unabaided
 
MSM fact checking a politician. The very definition of IRONY in its purist form.


MSM fact checks nothing what so ever, evidence nothing but lies for the last decade.

Muslims with box cutters brought down the twin towers, sure they did
 
Barr assigns US attorney in Connecticut to look into government surveillance involving Trump campaign: source

Attorney General William Barr has appointed a U.S. attorney to examine the origins of the Russia investigation and determine if intelligence collection efforts targeting the Trump campaign were "lawful and appropriate," a person familiar with the situation told Fox News on Monday evening.

John Durham, the U.S. attorney in Connecticut, will conduct the inquiry, the source said. The move comes as the Trump administration has pushed for answers on why federal authorities conducted the surveillance -- as well as whether Democrats were the ones who improperly colluded with foreign actors.

Two sources told Fox News earlier today that Barr was “serious” and had assigned DOJ personnel to the probe. Durham is known as a "hard-charging, bulldog" prosecutor, Fox News is told.

Sources familiar with matter say the focus of the probe includes the pre-transition period -- prior to Nov. 7, 2016 - - including the use and initiation of informants, as well as potential Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) abuses.
 
Barr assigns US attorney in Connecticut to look into government surveillance involving Trump campaign: source

Attorney General William Barr has appointed a U.S. attorney to examine the origins of the Russia investigation and determine if intelligence collection efforts targeting the Trump campaign were "lawful and appropriate," a person familiar with the situation told Fox News on Monday evening.

John Durham, the U.S. attorney in Connecticut, will conduct the inquiry, the source said. The move comes as the Trump administration has pushed for answers on why federal authorities conducted the surveillance -- as well as whether Democrats were the ones who improperly colluded with foreign actors.

Two sources told Fox News earlier today that Barr was “serious” and had assigned DOJ personnel to the probe. Durham is known as a "hard-charging, bulldog" prosecutor, Fox News is told.

Sources familiar with matter say the focus of the probe includes the pre-transition period -- prior to Nov. 7, 2016 - - including the use and initiation of informants, as well as potential Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) abuses.


Keep that imbecilic base of yours in line, Donny.
 

VN Store



Back
Top