Orange Bowl: Iowa vs Georgia Tech

#57
#57
They just referred to Ga Tech as a "Spread Offense". Apparently all you have to do now to be considered a spread team is have a WR on the field.
 
#59
#59
GAVol said:
They just referred to Ga Tech as a "Spread Offense". Apparently all you have to do now to be considered a spread team is have a WR on the field.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I caught that as well. You'd think these announcers would at least do a little basic research.
 
#62
#62
GAVol said:
They just referred to Ga Tech as a "Spread Offense". Apparently all you have to do now to be considered a spread team is have a WR on the field.
Click to expand...

:lolabove:

Clueless commentators.
 
#63
#63
I have to say that it was worth it for GT to lose that game just so they wouldn't have to stand next to that annoying woman at the trophy presentation.
 
#64
#64
GAVol said:
I have to say that it was worth it for GT to lose that game just so they wouldn't have to stand next to that annoying woman at the trophy presentation.
Click to expand...

Did you see the orange bowl mascot rubbing her back?! Priceless
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#65
#65
How about the Iowa fans in the stands booing when that woman congratulated Tech on their season? Classy. I hate living in Iowa. They win their first BCS bowl since 1959 and my Facebook blows up with "Iowa is the best!!!!!" statuses.
 
#66
#66
Sigh. I was in school and couldn't watch...

Spoke to my brother about it, and he said it turned into a who-sucks-less-a-thon. Truth?
 
#71
#71
VolBuck24 said:
This win caps off a solid bowl season for the Big 10.
Click to expand...


I am compelled to agree, though if it weren't for LSU sucking versus Pa. St. I'd be arguing their competition was largely weak. I mean, I guess I still could, but when a team from your own conference loses to the Big Ten that's an awfully easy come-back for the Big Ten apologists (of which there surprisingly remain quite a few).
 
#72
#72
lawgator1 said:
I am compelled to agree, though if it weren't for LSU sucking versus Pa. St. I'd be arguing their competition was largely weak. I mean, I guess I still could, but when a team from your own conference loses to the Big Ten that's an awfully easy come-back for the Big Ten apologists (of which there surprisingly remain quite a few).
Click to expand...

Yeah i know what you mean. It's still impressive that their 4 wins were all over top 15 teams.
 
#73
#73
miami stunk it against wisconsin...i didnt even give the badgers a chance....miami still has a while to go before they are "back"
 
#74
#74
miamicane said:
miami stunk it against wisconsin...i didnt even give the badgers a chance....miami still has a while to go before they are "back"
Click to expand...


Miami is making some significant strides in the right direction.

But they are in the ACC, which automatically in my book means they are suspect. Particularly on defense.
 
#75
#75
lawgator1 said:
I am compelled to agree, though if it weren't for LSU sucking versus Pa. St. I'd be arguing their competition was largely weak. I mean, I guess I still could, but when a team from your own conference loses to the Big Ten that's an awfully easy come-back for the Big Ten apologists (of which there surprisingly remain quite a few).
Click to expand...
In spite of the competition level, I think most have to admit the Big Ten came out and proved a lot of people wrong. Even though Michigan and Wisconsin are down right now, they've still got some pretty good football going on.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top