The bold is your own - irrelevant - rambling that I didn't say or imply.
What I did say is that NILs are private business deals with athletes that are unlikely to be structured as you wish and gave several reasons, not the least of which are endorsement value, legality, and that schools are not involved in them. If you understand the argument and what NILs are, why argue NILs should be arranged to compel bowl participation?
I countered your "free education, room/board, etc" by factually noting it's not free at all; the school trades a scholarship for players who bring in tens/millions in surplus revenues just for the football program. Like you, the players work for their "free" stuff, and it's a hell of a deal for the university.
Then I stated, in effect, that Hyatt has done more than any fan ever will in the restoration of this program and deserves better than thankless fans. Broadly, I supported the players' rights of association and earning income that everyone else in society enjoys, but yet the SCOTUS had to force the NCAA and schools - UT included - to observe those rights. Of predominantly black players.
Now, focus on the argument and while you're at it, explain your "Racist much?" comment - thanks, buddy!