Oregon's Cliff Harris

#1
Spartacavolus

Spartacavolus

Big Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
31,673
Likes
191
#1
got busted driving 118 mph in a 2011 Altima. 2 other Oregon players in car, which was not registered to him or the other passengers.

All I have to say is that since I had an altima in '95, they have evidently stepped up a little. Mine would have stopped at 80 mph and asked what the hell I was doing.
 
#2
#2
Nice one.

Also, the rental car was registered to an employee of Oregon. Hmmmmm...
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#3
#3
oregon employee loaned it to him. chippy is running one hell of a dirty program.
 
#4
#4
droski said:
oregon employee loaned it to him. chippy is running one hell of a dirty program.
Click to expand...

It was meant as a tongue-in-cheek comment. Compared to ours, osu's, usc's, and auburn's upcoming problems, you're right, this is nothing.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#5
#5
droski said:
oregon employee loaned it to him. chippy is running one hell of a dirty program.
Click to expand...

Wasn't an employee of the athletic department, and Cliff (supposedly) paid for it. The lady (supposedly) has the bank records to prove it.

"So, I rented the car for my own purposes on Friday. Cliff Harris and his licensed friend, who showed me his license, asked to borrow it and paid me the full amount in cash that I paid for the rental," said the woman, who agreed to speak to KEZI, on condition of anonymity.

The woman, who describes herself as a friend of Harris over the past few months, said she was unaware Cliff would be driving and also said she has proof that the amount she paid for the rental car matches two separte deposits she made into her bank account Friday.

"I do have a copy of my bank statement, showing two deposits Friday of $180 and $120."
Click to expand...

Still, stupid. Very stupid. At least he wasn't drinking or on drugs...I guess?

He's very immature.
 
#6
#6
Vol_til_I_die said:
It was meant as a tongue-in-cheek comment. Compared to ours, osu's, usc's, and auburn's upcoming problems, you're right, this is nothing.Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...


I think it's funny that it's an Altima more than anything. Dude was needling it. However, it is nothing now, but becomes something if he does that time and again, has a massive wreck and becomes something a program has trouble recovering from. It's all fun and games...just saying.
 
#7
#7
MaehlMan said:
Wasn't an employee of the athletic department, and Cliff (supposedly) paid for it. The lady (supposedly) has the bank records to prove it.



Still, stupid. Very stupid. At least he wasn't drinking or on drugs...I guess?

He's very immature.
Click to expand...

Now it sounds like a potential money laundering/car deal. Where did the cash come from for their checks? Was it deposited in cash? Does this lady have a bank account of players checks and just happens to rent a car on a friday for her personal use and give it to a preseason all american football player?
 
#8
#8
pl3 said:
Now it sounds like a potential money laundering/car deal. Where did the cash come from for their checks? Was it deposited in cash? Does this lady have a bank account of players checks and just happens to rent a car on a friday for her personal use and give it to a preseason all american football player?
Click to expand...

My guess is that the player wasn't allowed to rent the car because he was under 21, and he had the university employee, or "friend", rent a car for him. He reimbursed her for renting that car for his purposes.

Just a guess, but it seems logical.
 
#9
#9
MaehlMan said:
My guess is that the player wasn't allowed to rent the car because he was under 21, and he had the university employee, or "friend", rent a car for him. He reimbursed her for renting that car for his purposes.

Just a guess, but it seems logical.
Click to expand...

pretty sure you cant do that. At the least, the person actually renting the car is playing with major liability bomb
 
#11
#11
MaehlMan said:
My guess is that the player wasn't allowed to rent the car because he was under 21, and he had the university employee, or "friend", rent a car for him. He reimbursed her for renting that car for his purposes.

Just a guess, but it seems logical.
Click to expand...

That's what I was thinking too. There's a term for that. It's called fraud.

UPDATE: I just read a story about this. The kid had a suspended driver's license. That's yet another reason (other than not being old enough) that a car rental company wouldn't lease a car to him.

There's nothing quite like driving 118mph down the interstate with a suspended license in a rental car.

He received a $1,148 fine for driving over 100mph. Nice! I wonder what the additional fine is for doing that on a suspended license in a misappropriated vehicle.
 
Last edited:
#14
#14
Vol423 said:
...with a suspended driver's license. :eek:lol: What a moron!
Click to expand...

First of all, the football player who she rented the car to was a licensed driver. Second of all, you can't even tell if a license is suspended by looking at it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#15
#15
MaehlMan said:
First of all, the football player who she rented the car to was a licensed driver. Second of all, you can't even tell if a license is suspended by looking at it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Hmmm. Perhaps that's why it is fraud to rent a car from car rental company and then illegally rent it to a third party.

Also, so you're saying that there is another Oregon football player involved? Fantastic!
 
#16
#16
The stupid University of Oregon employee that rented that car should be thanking the Lord that the cops stopped that kid before he wrecked the car. The UofO employee would have been stuck with 100% of the repair costs out-of-pocket if that had happened. Insurance wouldn't have covered her due to her fraud.
 
#18
#18
So If a player got a benefit that he was not entitled to, wouldnt that be a violation?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#21
#21
justingroves said:
MaehlMan doesn't seem to get that yet
Click to expand...

I don't know, would it be an improper benefit? Part of me thinks that would be because he isn't entitled to rent a car due to his age, however part of me thinks that it wouldn't be because he reimbursed the renter for the car. I honestly don't know.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#22
#22
MaehlMan said:
I don't know, would it be an improper benefit? Part of me thinks that would be because he isn't entitled to rent a car due to his age, however part of me thinks that it wouldn't be because he reimbursed the renter for the car. I honestly don't know.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

Yes.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top