volnation2217
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2008
- Messages
- 468
- Likes
- 20
Ok, but what's the rule? What are the specifics of what is considered to be an improper benefit?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
got busted driving 118 mph in a 2011 Altima. 2 other Oregon players in car, which was not registered to him or the other passengers.
All I have to say is that since I had an altima in '95, they have evidently stepped up a little. Mine would have stopped at 80 mph and asked what the hell I was doing.
A guy that can't legally rent a car paying someone else to rent it for him.
The NCAA can say his status as an athlete is the only reason he had the car.
How many other cars has his "friend" rented for non-athletes at Oregon?
There's no way that can be proven. Especially because the employee that got it for him isn't an employee of the athletic department.
What is there to prove? You already said that the employee admitted it. You posted quotes from a newspaper article. It makes no difference whether that person was an employee of the athletic department or not. She is an employee of the university. If it were as simple as having a university employee from another department other than the AD do the dirty work, then every player at Auburn and Alabama would be receiving bags full of cash from the School of Business.
A guy that can't legally rent a car paying someone else to rent it for him.
The NCAA can say his status as an athlete is the only reason he had the car.
How many other cars has his "friend" rented for non-athletes at Oregon?
It can't be proven the other students wouldn't be able to receive that "benefit" also.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
The important question is how many the friend rented to other athletes. But unless it's a systemwide thing, this may be against the law and a misdemeanor but doesn't seem like a major NCAA violation at all.
A compliance official from another school suggested Tuesday that, if the facts as currently understood are true, the payment to Schmidling would likely protect the players’ eligibility. The loan of the car would be ruled an extra benefit, and Oregon would report it as such to the Pac-10 — the first step in such situations — but because it was of no monetary value, the players’ eligibility would not be threatened.