Our QB room will be the best in the SEC

That or his girlfriend. Your commitment to defending him is weirdly impressive
You see it as defending him when I’m simply point out the truth. I’ve done the same for JG. And you come at me with a comment about a play an 18 year old kid nearly broke his neck giving his all for his team. My relationship with him went out the window of importance at that moment.
 
You see it as defending him when I’m simply point out the truth. I’ve done the same for JG. And you come at me with a comment about a play an 18 year old kid nearly broke his neck giving his all for his team. My relationship with him went out the window of importance at that moment.
Yeah, well I'm not talking about JG.
Your truth is so far skewed towards bias (you even have his number in your handle), its a little weird. But you do you bro.

IMO, Tennessee has QB issues across the board
BM has looked good at times and others, pretty awful.
JG is who he is...is the QB against Missouri or Vandy? I don't know and neither does anyone else.
Shrout...a mystery
Bailey...an unknown at the college level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PulaskiVolFan
Yeah, well I'm not talking about JG.
Your truth is so far skewed towards bias (you even have his number in your handle), its a little weird. But you do you bro.

IMO, Tennessee has QB issues across the board
BM has looked good at times and others, pretty awful.
JG is who he is...is the QB against Missouri or Vandy? I don't know and neither does anyone else.
Shrout...a mystery
Bailey...an unknown at the college level.
Bias? 🤔. Pick a letter that has been untrue and I’ll listen. Until then....
 
Due to splitting time I would agree. Not playing seriously effects your stats wouldn’t you say?
The amount of time doesn't affect the percentage and rate stats that BM is so bad at. Of course he won't have as many TDs as someone with 200 more passes. He shouldn't have damn near the same amount of ints as the person with 200 more passes either. He has a bad turnover and inaccurate RATE.
 
Bias? 🤔. Pick a letter that has been untrue and I’ll listen. Until then....
You said he is more accurate than JG. That has been proven false by every single metric yet you won't admit it.

Do we need to list the rest?
 
You said he is more accurate than JG. That has been proven false by every single metric yet you won't admit it.

Do we need to list the rest?
No... you need to read quote 178 in the “What makes y’all think Harrison Bailey “ thread. When you’re done, read it again. And keep reading it until it sinks in that you are talking about decision making and not accuracy. It’s clearly defined
 
The amount of time doesn't affect the percentage and rate stats that BM is so bad at. Of course he won't have as many TDs as someone with 200 more passes. He shouldn't have damn near the same amount of ints as the person with 200 more passes either. He has a bad turnover and inaccurate RATE.
And you should never be trusted with "stats". You are a fundamentally dishonest person with a long history of distorting "stats" to fit your bias.

When Maurer was good... like his play vs UGA, MSU, and Bama... he was UT's most productive QB. When he was bad (not counting the trash time vs UF and UTC), he looked pretty bad. He looked indecisive and somewhat panicked vs UK. Just not the same kid who walked out against UGA and chucked it over their heads.

But there is ZERO chance of you giving the kind his fair due or even fair criticism. He is a threat to your idol that means he must be awful.

Why don't you try being a Vol fan for once rather than a JG cultist?
 
No... you need to read quote 178 in the “What makes y’all think Harrison Bailey “ thread. When you’re done, read it again. And keep reading it until it sinks in that you are talking about decision making and not accuracy. It’s clearly defined
The stats on secstatcat are clearly defined.

There is an accuracy stat that measures only accuracy of passes. Ball placement etc. It literally only measures if the pass was thrown accurately. Nothing to do with decision making or completions.

BM was third worst in the SEC. Only 44% of his passes are accurate.

You don't live in reality or accept the facts. Whatever your relationship is has rendered you incapable of having an honest discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PulaskiVolFan
That has been proven false by every single metric yet you won't admit it.
Stats or "metrics" in themselves do not prove or disprove anything. They support proofs and arguments or undermine them.

But what am I saying...? You could care less. You are going to distort the facts regardless.
 
The stats on secstatcat are clearly defined.

There is an accuracy stat that measures only accuracy of passes. Ball placement etc. It literally only measures if the pass was thrown accurately. Nothing to do with decision making or completions.
You really don't think the decision a QB makes impacts % completed or even accurate? If so, that's just plain stupid.

BM was third worst in the SEC. Only 44% of his passes are accurate.
That's before you consider the subjectivism in determining which passes are "catchable" and which are not.

I like that page. But that particular stat is pretty squirrelly. Versus MSU, UGA, and Bama... they gave Maurer a 54.76% accuracy rate to go with the exact same completion %. That's a problem because they also say UT's receivers dropped 9.52% of his passes. Could be a data entry error... but those numbers don't add up... at all.

You don't live in reality or accept the facts. Whatever your relationship is has rendered you incapable of having an honest discussion.
Wow... talk about a black hole calling the kettle black....
 
And you should never be trusted with "stats". You are a fundamentally dishonest person with a long history of distorting "stats" to fit your bias.

When Maurer was good... like his play vs UGA, MSU, and Bama... he was UT's most productive QB. When he was bad (not counting the trash time vs UF and UTC), he looked pretty bad. He looked indecisive and somewhat panicked vs UK. Just not the same kid who walked out against UGA and chucked it over their heads.

But there is ZERO chance of you giving the kind his fair due or even fair criticism. He is a threat to your idol that means he must be awful.

Why don't you try being a Vol fan for once rather than a JG cultist?
Switched into your other account I see.

He was good for a quarter. No TDs and multiple turnovers outside of one quarter that was only good because of a busted play pretty much. Still only 50% passing during his "great quarter."

1 int in 7 passes and 2 ints in 7 passes is a bad game. Completion percentage doesn't matter if you turn the ball over.

Say he played the whole MSU game doing the same thing as the first quarter. Thanks works out to 20/28 0 TDs 8 ints.

VS Bamab20/28 0tds 4 ints

He didn't play well those games.
 
The stats on secstatcat are clearly defined.

There is an accuracy stat that measures only accuracy of passes. Ball placement etc. It literally only measures if the pass was thrown accurately. Nothing to do with decision making or completions.

BM was third worst in the SEC. Only 44% of his passes are accurate.

You don't live in reality or accept the facts. Whatever your relationship is has rendered you incapable of having an honest discussion.
I wish I could remember who posted the stat lines (that you appreciate so much) showing BM as the more effective qb vs ranked opponents and given the same amount of time. If I find it I’ll repost it. If I decide I don’t want to look then so be it.
 
Switched into your other account I see.

He was good for a quarter. No TDs and multiple turnovers outside of one quarter that was only good because of a busted play pretty much. Still only 50% passing during his "great quarter."

1 int in 7 passes and 2 ints in 7 passes is a bad game. Completion percentage doesn't matter if you turn the ball over.

Say he played the whole MSU game doing the same thing as the first quarter. Thanks works out to 20/28 0 TDs 8 ints.

VS Bamab20/28 0tds 4 ints

He didn't play well those games.
Why did BM have higher completion % more yards and more tds vs the same 3 top 25 teams they both played this year...
 
I wish I could remember who posted the stat lines (that you appreciate so much) showing BM as the more effective qb vs ranked opponents and given the same amount of time. If I find it I’ll repost it. If I decide I don’t want to look then so be it.
Me!!!
 
Switched into your other account I see.
Liar... again. How many responses is that since you swore twice that you'd never respond to me again?

And it is VERY common for dishonest people such as yourself to accuse others of the things they're guilty of.

I've been here over 13 years. One screen name... through thick and thin nothing but a Vol fan.

He was good for a quarter. No TDs and multiple turnovers outside of one quarter that was only good because of a busted play pretty much. Still only 50% passing during his "great quarter."
Liar again. I have shown you the comparable stats between him and JG in those games. If you're saying Maurer wasn't good then you are saying that JG sucked.

1 int in 7 passes and 2 ints in 7 passes is a bad game.
So you are dishonest enough to blame BM for JJ essentially handing the ball to a DB?

Completion percentage doesn't matter if you turn the ball over.
But it does matter when you throw for lots of yardage... it does NOT matter when you don't and the team doesn't score.

Say he played the whole MSU game doing the same thing as the first quarter. Thanks works out to 20/28 0 TDs 8 ints.
Yeah... except we both know that's not how it works... well, maybe you are so dishonest you don't know that.

So you believe if JG had played the whole UGA game he would have been 3 for 15 for around 40 yards? Thanks.

VS Bamab20/28 0tds 4 ints
You are a fundamentally dishonest person.

He didn't play well those games.
Yeah. He did. He made mistakes but he moved the O and completed not only a good % of his passes but tough passes that forced the opponent to react rather than attack. I am still a little torn between you being so ignorant you actually believe what you write or just so dishonest that you can't help yourself.
 
I wish I could remember who posted the stat lines (that you appreciate so much) showing BM as the more effective qb vs ranked opponents and given the same amount of time. If I find it I’ll repost it. If I decide I don’t want to look then so be it.
In two of the ranked games y'all like touting he was 10/14 with 0 TDs and 3 ints. Good Percentage but bad play overall
 
Why did BM have higher completion % more yards and more tds vs the same 3 top 25 teams they both played this year...
50% vs UGA with a td on a wide open bust because of the defense not respecting the pass.

No TDs and a ton of turnovers the others. Nothing to brag on.
 

VN Store



Back
Top