Vercingetorix
Fluidmaster
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2006
- Messages
- 31,177
- Likes
- 2,727
Gah. Ridiculous. Can I say J.R.R. Tokien's novel? Yes. Despite the fact that he's dead and gone and has no idea I'm talking about him. As I said before, it's clearly IMPLIED. Stoops Troops is clearly IMPLIED not STATED. I can't make this any clearer.
Again, it's IMPLIED. Really sorry that this needs to be explained. I feel embarrassed for you.
Edit: For the slow
There are many ways to write what you're saying more clearly. Stoops Troops clearly implies possession. (though it needs the apostrophe) Basically, it's a case of horrible, horrible, writing. Or ignorance. I really don't care which it is.
Of course you can say "J.R.R. Tolkien's novel," although you should spell it right, because A) he actually wrote the novel himself, which is a real association, and B) "novel" in this case is a common noun. The Stoops Troops certainly appears to be a proper noun, which means it's just a name, and I think it's clearly up to the members of the Troops whether they want to simply name themselves after the guy (e.g., "the Stoops Troops") or imply that he's actually in command of them ("Stoops' Troops"). Although the latter might be a little presumptuous.
It's always funny to see someone draw a mistakenly over-pedantic line in the sand over a grammar point. The English language is bigger and more interesting than the rules you learned in the second grade.