Spurrier's offense was a spread with very little run option. The goal was the same -- create favorable match-ups as between your very best receivers and slower defensive players. Wuerffel was just plain terrific on picking up on those mismatches and he and the Gators exploited them well.
The difference is that a traditional spread option adds to the passing game a serious run threat. And not just from the RB. It adds on the QB keep, the RB, and any one of 4 receivers as run threats coming out of the backfield.
I know people go on and on about SEC defensive speed. And I acknowledge that SEC defensive players can converge on the ball quicker than other cofnerence defenses that have faced the spread.
But I truly believe that, if the offense is run correctly, then all things being equal (speed and athleticism between offense and defense) the spread really puts a lot of pressure on a defense and, where the defense breaks down and makes a mistake, it can be very costly.
The three keys will be whether the young Florida offensive line can handle the complexity of their assignments, whether Tebow can learn the reads and perform them, and whether Tebow can present a realistic throwing threat. The last one is the key to keep the defense from putting 8 in the box and just running up and down the line to stop the run.
If the Gators can accomplish those three things, then the Spread will be successful. Fail in any one, and the ofense will struggle. Right now, based on what I've seen, the most problematic area is the offensive line. We keep getting tons of penalties running the current offense. If they can't completely master the current scheme, they will have real trouble running the Spread.
Time will tell.