Paul Pelosi attacked in home invasion

Security system, home cameras, Police body cameras, gated community guards, neighbors surveillance.... just spit balling on this one. But for a security system to fail is a reach considering the safe guards put on them.
Jeffrey Epstein would say hi, but....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Majors
Nothing. Get it, Madame Speaker.
Seems like you're reflexively fighting the possible characterization from the bigots that gay sex is related to this story. If there's nothing wrong with Paul playing poke the pickle, then there is nothing to fight against. You're not going to alter the bigot's thinking. And no one else cares...except for the embarrassment to Nancy.
 
Seems like you're reflexively fighting the possible characterization from the bigots that gay sex is related to this story. If there's nothing wrong with Paul playing poke the pickle, then there is nothing to fight against. You're not going to alter the bigot's thinking. And no one else cares...except for the embarrassment to Nancy.
I don't think Nan Nan can be embarrassed by anything.
 
Jeffrey Epstein would say hi, but....
That one was expected. Bet Epsteins was working and has an archived database with high resolution. Can we expect Paul Pelosi "alone" in the early morning to have faulty security at the home of the #3 person in our Government?
 
Seems like you're reflexively fighting the possible characterization from the bigots that gay sex is related to this story. If there's nothing wrong with Paul playing poke the pickle, then there is nothing to fight against. You're not going to alter the bigot's thinking. And no one else cares...except for the embarrassment to Nancy.
Of course there is nothing wrong with Paul getting him some bro time, though that is just speculation at this point. I just don't like how gay men are being represented in this.
 
Now figure out who the 3rd person was.

A. There was never a third person, it was incomplete reporting on a developing story that was misunderstood by people who base theories on the security at random SF Neighborhoods without doing routine checks to see if the involved persons even lived in that neighborhood and think they might still be right even after reading that the involved person “once lived” there.

B. There was a third person who let the police inside and the police are now covering it up after accidentally disclosing it to some random reporter at politico, but those same illiterate morons are too smart for them.

Which one seems more likely to you?
 
Last edited:
What does that matter to you?
When did I say it did? You stated "Of course there is nothing wrong with Paul getting him some bro time." I would guess that a good number of people (including his wife) would beg to differ.
 
A. There was never a third person, it was incomplete reporting on a developing story that was misunderstood by people who base theories on the security at random SF Neighborhoods without doing routine checks to see if the involved persons even lived in that neighborhood and think they might still be right even after reading that the involved person “once lived” there.

B. There was a third person who let the police inside and the police are now covering it up after accidentally disclosing it to some random reporter at politico, but those same illiterate morons are too smart for them.

Which one seems more likely to you?

How did your last argument here about a home invasion turn out?
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
When did I say it did? You stated "Of course there is nothing wrong with Paul getting him some bro time." I would guess that a good number of people (including his wife) would beg to differ.

In the normal world I would say you are correct. In this case, this is a marriage about the same as Bill and Hillary are a marriage. I’m sure Nancy doesn’t give a damn what he does as long as he keeps it out of the news. Which is something he apparently is incapable of doing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols

VN Store



Back
Top