Dick response. I was at the game you donkey. The fact that Pearce's health was risked on Kickoff coverage instead of LEO is indicative of a situation.Maybe go back and rewatch the game….in slow motion if it helps…thanks for the title
I have to agree ncst whole offense was to keep pearce out of the picture and he still made there life miserable.And with the attention on him all our d line is living like kingsI wonder do yall watch the games sometimes… Pearce didn’t “start” games last year but he played alot and he played alot last night as well… as much depth as we have idc who starts… Pearce was in the back field alot and I’m noticing they drop him in coverage a good bit more this year so far… I think they are trying to help him create even more value for the draft… but the DL is the last thing you should have any concerns with…
That wasn’t Pearce that was Peyton Lewis. James Pearce was never on kickoff coverage buddyDick response. I was at the game you donkey. The fact that Pearce's health was risked on Kickoff coverage instead of LEO is indicative of a situation.
NAME ANOTHER TEAM THAT INSERTS A "POTENTIAL #1 DRAFT PICK" ON SPECIAL TEAMS KICK RETURN COVERAGE.
Further, why would CJH risk Pearce on special teams when we're up 20-3?
Does. Not. Compute.
At a minimum it begs the question.
JP is a beast and showed out last night. You don’t have to get sacks to affect the game.Not understanding what's going on with Pearce. Josephs started in front of him at LEO last night, yet Pearce played on special teams and made a nice stop on kick off D. Is he injured / knicked up? Discliplinary action? Not discounting Josephs is a solid player, but Pearce has been built up all preseason as a potential top 10 draft pick.
I agree with you for the most part. I actually think he will improve in sec play because teams will call more long developing passing plays. These first two games the teams have been so over matched they have been calling almost all quick passing playsLook not to be that guy but I see it being said that he is being double teamed and teams are scheming against him. Well when you have a supposed elite pass rusher that’s being talked about as a top 5 pick, doesn’t every team do that?
Derek Barnett got double teamed a lot. Teams schemed around him. He still dominated. Myles Garret, Will Anderson, Clowney and others got the same treatment. They still dominated. I love Pearce but he seems to be getting neutralized fairly easily these past two games.
I know he will improve but almost every team is gonna scheme for him and double team him. He either is that dude who can fight through it and dominate or not.
Not understanding what's going on with Pearce. Josephs started in front of him at LEO last night, yet Pearce played on special teams and made a nice stop on kick off D. Is he injured / knicked up? Discliplinary action? Not discounting Josephs is a solid player, but Pearce has been built up all preseason as a potential top 10 draft pick.
Watch how James Pearce is viciously double-team blocked on this play (which was a successful strip=sack_
I believe both were on the field on the first play.Not understanding what's going on with Pearce. Josephs started in front of him at LEO last night, yet Pearce played on special teams and made a nice stop on kick off D. Is he injured / knicked up? Discliplinary action? Not discounting Josephs is a solid player, but Pearce has been built up all preseason as a potential top 10 draft pick.
Not understanding what's going on with Pearce. Josephs started in front of him at LEO last night, yet Pearce played on special teams and made a nice stop on kick off D. Is he injured / knicked up? Discliplinary action? Not discounting Josephs is a solid player, but Pearce has been built up all preseason as a potential top 10 draft pick.
I was wondering what change we made to suddenly disrupt their passing game over the top. We started to get more pressure in the QB, but that may because we took away the middle by dropping JP? I also was thinking they were probably scheming against JP. Both would change his production when it comes to TFLs and sacks. To your point on development, I agree that it helps to create more versatility in a player. Albeit, may have been out of necessity as much as anything else.I wonder do yall watch the games sometimes… Pearce didn’t “start” games last year but he played alot and he played alot last night as well… as much depth as we have idc who starts… Pearce was in the back field alot and I’m noticing they drop him in coverage a good bit more this year so far… I think they are trying to help him create even more value for the draft… but the DL is the last thing you should have any concerns with…
I personally would love us to rush him all the time but it’s chess… and if they slide protection his way but he drops then that leaves someone on the back side unblocked or every other DL 1 on 1… either way that allows our defense to get a lot more pressure… Norman Lott was an animal, west was an animal, big O l, Eason, Bailey all played dominant and Joseph’s lived in the backfield… they all work very hard and would be successful regardless but having Pearce be the number 1 priority for the OC allows them to dominate even more.I was wondering what change we made to suddenly disrupt their passing game over the top. We started to get more pressure in the QB, but that may because we took away the middle by dropping JP? I also was thinking they were probably scheming against JP. Both would change his production when it comes to TFLs and sacks. To your point on development, I agree that it helps to create more versatility in a player. Albeit, may have been out of necessity as much as anything else.