What is the significance of this story? Any commentator can claim to know some kind of evidence without naming names. It just shows that anyone in the media has the privilege to destroy anyone or anybodys reputation with rumors and innuendos.
If this was really a story then the coward would have named the program involved. He would have stated the known facts to substantiate his claim. Until he does so, then it is fake news.
If this was really a story then the coward would have named the program involved. He would have stated the known facts to substantiate his claim. Until he does so, then it is fake news.