MercyPercy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
- Messages
- 8,732
- Likes
- 8,329
It's not happening right?
YouTube bans using word 'Christian' in targeted ads - Premier Christian News | Headlines, Breaking News, Comment & Analysis
How quickly will they move from "it's not happening" to justifying it?
I have products that are disqualified from advertising on Google's Shopping network because they say the word "black" in the title. Should black people be freaking out and talking about persecution?
I agree with your idea on good and bad ideas allowed to compete without censorship. I disagree a privately owned outlet doesn't have the right to censor whomever they want.YES.
And I would support you myself to do that.
Any form of censorship is repugnant. Saying both sides censor doesn't absolve the fact such censorship is Un-American. I think it's clear I hate communism, but I would fight anyone trying to censor it. Good and Bad ideas should all have a chance to fight it out in the public square, and in a digital world these are the public squares. This is what was once known as "classical liberalism", ....ancient and crazy ideal I know, but there was a time when the left championed free expression of ideas, and open and honest debate.
YES.
And I would support you myself to do that.
Any form of censorship is repugnant. Saying both sides censor doesn't absolve the fact such censorship is Un-American. I think it's clear I hate communism, but I would fight anyone trying to censor it. Good and Bad ideas should all have a chance to fight it out in the public square, and in a digital world these are the public squares. This is what was once known as "classical liberalism", ....ancient and crazy ideal I know, but there was a time when the left championed free expression of ideas, and open and honest debate.
I agree with your idea on good and bad ideas allowed to compete without censorship. I disagree a privately owned outlet doesn't have the right to censor whomever they want.
1. Yes.So A coffee shop can censor people eating at one of their tables?
Does it matter if the outlet decalres itself a publisher or a platform? Can it choose to be both when convenient?
If an outlet DOES choose to censor when it feels justified can I then sue it for slander when it allows content I find to be slanderous? Does the act of editing content not oblige it to have responsibility for all content?
OK, so Freak should just let me say **** the ******** dog **** out of ***** ****** who say ****** like this?
1. Yes.
2. No. Doesn't matter.
3. No. I don't know.
Is that language apart of your religion? Can you show that your religious rights are violated by that? Do you genuinely beleieve professing ones Christian faith is equal to profanity? Is it just professing Christian faith at issue? If a platform ONLY selectively blocks religious content from SOME religions does that matter? If it's okay to pick and choose which religious faiths to block, can teh same be applied to race, nationality?
There are several court rulings through history that I don't agree with. You can add that one to the listyou sure about that? Marsh v. Alabama Marsh v. Alabama - Wikipedia
"The court pointed out that the more an owner opens his property up to the public in general, the more his rights are circumscribed by the statutory and constitutional rights of those who are invited in."
Is that language apart of your religion? Can you show that your religious rights are violated by that? Do you genuinely beleieve professing ones Christian faith is equal to profanity? Is it just professing Christian faith at issue? If a platform ONLY selectively blocks religious content from SOME religions does that matter? If it's okay to pick and choose which religious faiths to block, can the same be applied to race, nationality?
Yes.So A coffee shop can censor people eating at one of their tables?
Does it matter if the outlet decalres itself a publisher or a platform? Can it choose to be both when convenient?
If an outlet DOES choose to censor when it feels justified can I then sue it for slander when it allows content I find to be slanderous? Does the act of editing content not oblige it to have responsibility for all content?