Police shooting black man in the back ... again (Kenosha, WI)

[NEO]

I watched them all as they were being released, before anyone had time to doctor them. The video of the shooter running from the guy with an allege "molotov" came first. After that, he ran down the street and was tackled by the guy with a skateboard and another.

So he was assaulted before firing his gun?

Correct?

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

Negative. There were 2 chases. Watch a little more

Hmm. I thought I’d seen all of the footage. Goes to show you never know. Thanks.

 

[bUTchLookin4Dimez]

I don’t think they are truly seeking equality or even know what it means.... The N word was used during the atrocities that happened in our past.... the word has changed overtime to a sort of positive connotation in the black community..... it doesn’t effect anyone else at all.... we should let them use that word if they want too while also knowing it has no place in our language.

So you admit it's a double standard?

 

[theFallGuy]

stopping systemic racism, one independent business destruction at a time!

 

[bUTchLookin4Dimez]

So he was assaulted before firing his gun?

Correct?

The first time, I wouldn't say he was assaulted because he fired before the crazy guy with a molotov got to him. The 2nd time, yes. I'd say both were justified.

 

[lacrossepro70]

You can always spot a liberal bc they always use the race card and are covered in white guilt.

Okay Confucius

 

[C-south]

I don’t think they are truly seeking equality or even know what it means.... The N word was used during the atrocities that happened in our past.... the word has changed overtime to a sort of positive connotation in the black community..... it doesn’t effect anyone else at all.... we should let them use that word if they want too while also knowing it has no place in our language.

Meh. It’s either bad or it’s not.

 

[Y9 Vol]

I don't think you know a black person irl. Lol


This is stupid. Don't speak about what people think or want when you have no clue.

Oh the irony

 

[golfballs]

You can argue that the kid shouldn’t have been there but that has nothing to do w these charges. He was clearly defending himself.

 

[bUTchLookin4Dimez]

First one

 

[KB5252]

I didn't see any brawling. I see a dude crawling on the grounnd. Again. Pepper sprey or tazer would have sufficed juuuust fine.

Tazer was used. But they are notoriously ineffective and unreliable, so much so that most departments mandate they be used only when another officer is also aimed and ready to use lethal force.

The tazer didn't work for whatever reason leaving them with the lethal option when he started reaching on his person and in his car.

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

Negative. There were 2 chases. Watch a little more

Is this what you are talking about?

 

[bUTchLookin4Dimez]

You can argue that the kid shouldn’t have been there but that has nothing to do w these charges. He was clearly defending himself.

How can you argue that? How is the rights of a rioter/ looter/ protestor anymore important than his?

 

[lacrossepro70]

Tazer was used. But they are notoriously ineffective and unreliable, so much so that most departments mandate they be used only when another officer is also aimed and ready to use lethal force.

The tazer didn't work for whatever reason leaving them with the lethal option when he started reaching on his person and in his car.

You forgot pepper spray and baton

 

[Blake25p]

This another classic example of not waiting until the facts come out to scream radical injustice. This was a good shoot. Goes to show the Woke mob will support anyone, including a rapist.

 

[Tyler Durden]

I'm not the one that made the initial comment. I'm giving you a reason.

Weak

 

[volbeast33]

It’s not the word it’s the double standard. It’s like telling someone not to use the lords name in vain then telling them to shut their damn mouth.

I consider it more of a cultural thing in the black community brought on by slavery..... I don’t see why it is a big deal..... everyone should try to get along and help each other to live a great life....

 

[KB5252]

First one

That was self defense to me, he was retreating and a weapon was used against him while he was being pursued, he then turned and fired.

 

[golfballs]

How can you argue that? How is the rights of a rioter/ looter/ protestor anymore important than his?

I’m talking about his decision to go there. Nothing to do w his right

 

[NEO]

The first time, I wouldn't say he was assaulted because he fired before the crazy guy with a molotov got to him. The 2nd time, yes. I'd say both were justified.

My personal opinion is about 10 percent of protestors are peaceful and looking for growth as a nation.

90 percent are anarchist and thugs.

What the media doesnt get yet is that if militias start popping up, and I mean real militias, about 10 percent will be there to protect and 90 percent will be there to kill and start a war.

If these riots arent stopped and militias start getting heavily involved this will turn into all out civil war very quickly.

But...maybe this is the democrats end game to gather all the guns up.

 

[DEFENDTHISHOUSE]

That was self defense to me, he was retreating and a weapon was used against him while he was being pursued, he then turned and fired.

Something is thrown at him. It was on fire. Possibly an improvised Molotov cocktail?

 

[RockyTop85]

Still hinges on the justification for the original shooting. It’s one thing to shoot three people in self defense. It’s another to murder one and shoot two more while you’re fleeing the scene.

Unless I’ve missed something, the narrative that the second and third shootings were justified is just that: a narrative.

 

[lacrossepro70]

You can argue that the kid shouldn’t have been there but that has nothing to do w these charges. He was clearly defending himself.

Shouldn't have been there but you forgot he shouldn't have crossed state lines with a rifle and he shouldn't have been brandishing it. Stupid games stupid prizes etc

 

[volbeast33]

Okay Confucius

See drug another one in

 

[KB5252]

why was he attacked? Why is a 17 year old from Illinois in Wisconsin? Armed during protests? We can only assume that he came to shoot someone. You can go ahead and make him a martyr.

Why would someone go to a protest with a Molotov cocktail, are we to assume they went there to kill someone?