It would not hurt. Libs need to get off the Global Warming Climate Change nonsense and focus on the basics again. Pollution in our waters is a real problem.
Sorry but I put clean burning plastics on the same level as clean coal. Don't think we have the technology. I think we should shoot it toward the sun instead
Damn treehugging liberal
Just trying to have what I consider a regular conversation with you. It's hard to lock you down to a position since you just like to argue.
I lived in town. We took the bags and put them in bigger metal trash cans (not plastic) , and the city picked them up and hauled the trash away. I guess you think they put it in the river?Must have been rough taking it out back and throwing it over the bank.
No, you're trying to corner me into a position which is entirely unrelated.
You say banning straws is a good thing. I said it was ironic they would ban one form of plastic waste only to turn around and give out yet another form of plastic waste that's made of far more material than the one they banned. You said it wasn't irony because they can recycle it. Yet, they can't.
Regardless of the "exchange" program, how many of those needles actually get put in the proper bins anyway? It's a moot point.
The waste-to-fuel industry has received some opposition from environmental organisations, with protests causing the halting of a planned waste-to-fuel facility in Lancashire last year, and investigations launched into such sites in Canberra, Australia following environmentalists’ complaints.
Larry O’Loughlin, executive director of the ACT Conservation Council, spoke to The Guardian about the environmental threat he says waste-to-plastic sites pose. He rejected the notion that the industry is a form of recycling, as the plastics may only be used once before being turned into fuel. He also argued that widespread adoption of the method could slow efforts to find fuel alternatives, saying: “At a time of reducing carbon emissions, they are introducing another fossil fuel. The ACT is trying to move to zero emissions by 2050. How are we going to do that by setting up a refinery here?”
I think what you are wanting to say is it would also be helpful to reduce plastic pollution if they didn't "advocate" needle use. Maybe so, Grand.
Rail guns
Melt it too a small mass and launch it.
I can get behind that idea
Yea the druggies are waiting to get high and walk blocks to exchange them instead of just picking one up laying there.Glad you and Grand see eye to eye that California is to blame for the plastics in the oceans because of it's clean needle program. They are not the only state with such programs and if you exchange your old needle for a new one that is one less needle that makes it way into the oceans.
I have had an idea for a while and I want to get your insight considering your occupation.
Do you think much of the plastic waste could be recycled into building materials? I'm thinking of external items like decking, fascia, siding, etc. But aslo interior components like mouldings, framing studs, backer board. Studs, for example, could be engineered with say a 60/40 plastics to wood chip held together with the help of strong adhesives.
I have had an idea for a while and I want to get your insight considering your occupation.
Do you think much of the plastic waste could be recycled into building materials? I'm thinking of external items like decking, fascia, siding, etc. But aslo interior components like mouldings, framing studs, backer board. Studs, for example, could be engineered with say a 60/40 plastics to wood chip held together with the help of strong adhesives.