Poor Poor GOP 2008 is gonna hurt

I think he was one of those characters from either Fraggle Rock or the Dark Crystal when I was a kid. There are too many people that vote on appearances and those types of nuances. Take his platform and put him in the body of someone else's man crush and you might have a winner....

tom-cruise-hilter-6-26-07.jpg
 
A person can take care of their health and still get a cold or whatever, so you are wrong on your own account, again not a first for you. My remark had to with a rational person also taking care of their healthcare needs, meaning insurance as well. Sorry you can't dive into things and do some figuring.

I'm going on solely what you stated. Say what you mean, mean what you say. If it had to do with that come out and say that. As I said, I can't figure what you're thinking. It's hard to dive into a very simplistic statement and read that you're arguing for some comprehensive thought.

Let me ask you this. Do you pay for 100% of your hospital bills? Prescriptions? Everyone else in your home? Do you pay every single penny of the cost for your healthcare?
 
LOL..I was watching Fox News the other day and they were talking about good ol Fred and they were saying "just because he has the looks of a Pres., He has the face for it". Looks can win you a seat in the gov. today eh? :dunno:
 
Looking at his latest numbers we won't need to worry about Fred much longer. NBC will be happy to write him back into L&O.
 
I'm going on solely what you stated. Say what you mean, mean what you say. If it had to do with that come out and say that. As I said, I can't figure what you're thinking. It's hard to dive into a very simplistic statement and read that you're arguing for some comprehensive thought.

Let me ask you this. Do you pay for 100% of your hospital bills? Prescriptions? Everyone else in your home? Do you pay every single penny of the cost for your healthcare?

So sorry Cspinn, if had known you were going to respond to it I would indeed have made it more clear for your sake. I agree it is hard for you to dive into simple statements.

I have deals with people for my healthcare, I pay them the agreed upon deal and they pay according to the deal. I pay any agreed differences directly to the healthcare provider. What does paying for every single penny have to do with me not wanting the government to raise taxes to pay for healthcare?
 
I think he was one of those characters from either Fraggle Rock or the Dark Crystal when I was a kid. There are too many people that vote on appearances and those types of nuances. Take his platform and put him in the body of someone else's man crush and you might have a winner....

tom-cruise-hilter-6-26-07.jpg


In other words the GOP has no shot and I am stuck voting Libertarian again?

:yes:
 
So sorry Cspinn, if had known you were going to respond to it I would indeed have made it more clear for your sake. I agree it is hard for you to dive into simple statements.

I have deals with people for my healthcare, I pay them the agreed upon deal and they pay according to the deal. I pay any agreed differences directly to the healthcare provider. What does paying for every single penny have to do with me not wanting the government to raise taxes to pay for healthcare?

Wow. Why are your Hanes in a wad? Obviously your original statement wasn't simple. You had to clarify. But so I digress.

My point is that you do not pay the full cost. You depend on some outside entity to pay the bulk of the cost. You chip in a small amount and someone else pays the rest. The point is that you lose part of your salary due to this outside entity taking it from you and they cover your healthcare. The equivalent is the case with government healthcare. I am in no way supporting Hillary's move but if you hate losing tax money for healthcare then you should also argue the same thing you have now. Same logic. Whether you like it or not you have your taxes going into healthcare for government employees, politicians, veterans and their families, those on Medicare, and those children in middle class families with no healthcare. It is also going into Medicaid funds as well. As for the tax hikes, I think all of the plans that even allude to one being needed only affect a very high percentage of household income. Are you in that bracket?
 
My point is that you do not pay the full cost. You depend on some outside entity to pay the bulk of the cost. You chip in a small amount and someone else pays the rest. The point is that you lose part of your salary due to this outside entity taking it from you and they cover your healthcare. The equivalent is the case with government healthcare. I am in no way supporting Hillary's move but if you hate losing tax money for healthcare then you should also argue the same thing you have now. Same logic. Whether you like it or not you have your taxes going into healthcare for government employees, politicians, veterans and their families, those on Medicare, and those children in middle class families with no healthcare. It is also going into Medicaid funds as well. As for the tax hikes, I think all of the plans that even allude to one being needed only affect a very high percentage of household income. Are you in that bracket?

First point, I choose whether I want this to happen or not. My choice, not someone else making that choice for me.

Point two, just because it is already happening does not mean I like it and especially does not mean I want more of it.
 
Still lumping every one into one small category! Only democrats are rational!

Nice! :eek:k:

What is today's word boys and girls?

Marginalize............

V-106-picture

It's funny: I said something about rational people thinking you should spend money that you have, unlike the last 7 years where trillions have been spent with little regard for when the bills will eventually come due. And you automatically assume that I was talking about you, or somebody (It's difficult to discern from you posts.) :crazy:

If the shoe fits.....:whistling:

If you want to talk about marginalizing, let's look at the GOP: "to hell with gays, to hell with liberals, to hell with immigrants, to hell with pro-choice, to hell with everbody who doesn't agree with us."
 
It's funny: I said something about rational people thinking you should spend money that you have, unlike the last 7 years where trillions have been spent with little regard for when the bills will eventually come due. And you automatically assume that I was talking about you, or somebody (It's difficult to discern from you posts.) :crazy:

If the shoe fits.....:whistling:

If you want to talk about marginalizing, let's look at the GOP: "to hell with gays, to hell with liberals, to hell with immigrants, to hell with pro-choice, to hell with everbody who doesn't agree with us."


Yeah, every republican thinks that way. :ill_h4h:

So, do you prefer to be called a bigot or a hatemonger?

:dunno:
 
If you want to talk about marginalizing, let's look at the GOP: "to hell with gays, to hell with liberals, to hell with immigrants, to hell with pro-choice, to hell with everbody who doesn't agree with us."

I think you just marginalized the GOP by complaining that they marginalize.
 
I'm a Libertarian that generally votes Republican when there is an inkling that it matters (I live in Connecticut, so my Prez vote is always Libertarian....Though i voted for Lieberman over Lamont, and vote Lib in the Gubernatorial races).

But the GOP has me in a tough spot. I like the Pretender (Fred), but the frontrunner (Rudy) is generally a constitutional liberal, who doesn't support the 2nd Amendment, which in it's true interpretation i am a full supporter of. But the alternative is the Pant Suit from Arky, who supports the Black Panthers, and free healthcare for those who are too lazy to work...I just won't tell Rudy about my guns, and will support him, i reckon
 

VN Store



Back
Top