In the seventh conversation, edited by Professor Khoury, the emperor touches on the theme of the holy war. The emperor must have known that surah 2, 256 reads: "There is no compulsion in religion". According to the experts, this is one of the suras of the early period, when Mohammed was still powerless and under threat. But naturally the emperor also knew the instructions, developed later and recorded in the Qur'an, concerning holy war. Without descending to details, such as the difference in treatment accorded to those who have the "Book" and the "infidels", he addresses his interlocutor with a startling brusqueness on the central question about the relationship between religion and violence in general, saying: "Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached". (emphasis added)
God", he says, "is not pleased by blood - and not acting reasonably is contrary to God's nature. Faith is born of the soul, not the body. Whoever would lead someone to faith needs the ability to speak well and to reason properly, without violence and threats... To convince a reasonable soul, one does not need a strong arm, or weapons of any kind, or any other means of threatening a person with death...".
Yes, because we Catholics violently rioted in response to the Met Exhibit of the Blessed Mary with elephant dung thrown on her...if a muslim leader quoted something disparaging about catholics, you all know full well there would be the same outcry. burning an effigy has been something that has been going on for millenia so don't get all up in arms because someone in a turban with a beard does it.
if a muslim leader quoted something disparaging about catholics, you all know full well there would be the same outcry. burning an effigy has been something that has been going on for millenia so don't get all up in arms because someone in a turban with a beard does it.
A doctrinal conservative, his greatest fear appears to be the loss of a uniform Catholic identity, not exactly the best jumping-off point for tolerance or interfaith dialogue.
You should have probably actually read the speech first. Second, I am quite positive that the Pope (not 'Popeatine') is considerably more educated in the Crusades than you are. I would be willing to go out on a limb and say that the extent of your education concerning the Crusades is threefold: 10 pages in your college Western Civ text book, the movie Kingdom of Heaven, and a History Channel program "covering" the Crusades.I guess Popeatine doesn't remember The Crusades. :dunno:
what a stupid thing to say the divide the religions more than they already are
Uh huh, and a Notre Dame student would shoot some 70+ Muslim grandma.
READ THE FRIGGIN' NYT EDITORIAL.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/16/opinion/16sat2.html?ex=1316059200&en=55dd46982dc29167&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
The whole thing disparages Catholics in general and this pontiff in particular. The Muslims are just poor misunderstood folk who only desire to be allowed to carry out their grisly pursuits without some figure with moral authority reminding the world it doesn't have to be this way.
Yeah, that whole "One, holy, catholic and apostolic church" thing is just getting in the way.
To the learned dhimmies editorial staff of the Gray Lady I say this: Bite me.
Nobody has called to Pinch Schulzberger's head on a pole, yet.
I will fire back concerning your earlier remark. Historically, when was the last time a collection of Catholics conducted violent reprisals at the mere commentary from any figure?ahem, when you wake up and realize there are bad muslims and good muslims, you go ahead and fire back at me.
and since when was schulzberger a muslim leader?
ahem, when you wake up and realize there are bad muslims and good muslims, you go ahead and fire back at me.
and since when was schulzberger a muslim leader?
I will fire back concerning your earlier remark. Historically, when was the last time a collection of Catholics conducted violent reprisals at the mere commentary from any figure?
I agree that most Muslims, at least most I have encountered, are interested in pursuing peace. However, they are also not in the least bit interested in taking a stand against the individuals that overwhelmingly cast their religion in a negative light. Not even many Imams and Sheiks have made public outcries or pleas against terrorism.that's fine, i understand that point, but everytime i see a post like this, it seems like there are 3 or 4 people that imply this is a problem with islam. it's not, it's a problem with RADICAL islam.
I agree that most Muslims, at least most I have encountered, are interested in pursuing peace. However, they are also not in the least bit interested in taking a stand against the individuals that overwhelmingly cast their religion in a negative light. Not even many Imams and Sheiks have made public outcries or pleas against terrorism.
Regardless of your response about all Muslims and some Muslims, you still have not justified this response.if a muslim leader quoted something disparaging about catholics, you all know full well there would be the same outcry. burning an effigy has been something that has been going on for millenia so don't get all up in arms because someone in a turban with a beard does it.
I haven't seen any Southern Baptists burning Rosie O'Donnell in effigy after her "radical Christian" comment the other day. She wasn't quoting some 14th century monarch - she was telling us her true feelings!
Look, Rosie and Pinch (now THERE'S a combo deluxe) have a perfect right in this country to make whatever political comment they want - just as I have a perfect right to call them on it. I may write a nasty LTE to Pinch and the boys, or send an e-mail to Baba Wawa's sponsors pointing out that Rosie's comments will cause me to reconsider purchasing their products, but I'm not going to set anything afire over it.
The Pope is absolutely correct. To say otherwise ENDORSES the use of force to spread a religion.
emain, which side are YOU on?
Regardless of your response about all Muslims and some Muslims, you still have not justified this response.
speaking out against one's religion is one of the quickest ways to tick them off, i don't blame the more sane muslims for burning effigies. i however believe that violence related to the matter is absolutely shameful (which is an understatement.) if and when a muslim leader makes comments about the catholic church in a very public arena, such as the pope did, i do believe there will be outcry from the church.